Compare IBM Rational Service Tester vs. Silk Test

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Rational Service Tester Logo
83 views|50 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
5,455 views|3,688 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Rational Service Tester? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

More Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
40th
Views
83
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
14th
Views
5,455
Comparisons
3,688
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational Service TesterSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Learn
IBM
Micro Focus
Overview
IBM Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality is a functional and regression testing tool that enables code-free testing of non-GUI services. Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality helps software delivery teams ensure the functionality, interoperability and performance of service-oriented architecture (SOA) software and web services. Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality helps software teams perform and deliver quality assurance.SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Service Tester
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
IMM, ADP, Bangkok Hospital, Nice Céte d'Azur, Durham Police Department, Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Getin Noble Bank S.A., KPJ Healthcare Berhad Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company50%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company6%
Retailer4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,790 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Rational Service Tester is ranked 40th in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. IBM Rational Service Tester is rated 0, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". IBM Rational Service Tester is most compared with SoapUI Pro, whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.