Compare IBM Rational Service Tester vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
IBM Rational Service Tester is ranked 48th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. IBM Rational Service Tester is rated 0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". IBM Rational Service Tester is most compared with SoapUI Pro, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Katalon Studio and Apache JMeter.
 |
 Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020. 399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012. |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | I think that the pricing is quite good. For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 73 Comparisons 44 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 4,503 Comparisons 3,616 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 435 Avg. Rating 8.8 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 100% of the time. |  Compared 16% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Rational Service Tester | |
Learn | |
| IBM | Microsoft |
Overview | |
| IBM Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality is a functional and regression testing tool that enables code-free testing of non-GUI services. Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality helps software delivery teams ensure the functionality, interoperability and performance of service-oriented architecture (SOA) software and web services. Rational Service Tester for SOA Quality helps software teams perform and deliver quality assurance. | Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Rational Service Tester | Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional |
Sample Customers | |
| IMM, ADP, Bangkok Hospital, Nice Céte d'Azur, Durham Police Department, Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Getin Noble Bank S.A., KPJ Healthcare Berhad | Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Software R&D Company51% Insurance Company13% Healthcare Company6% Media Company6% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
399,540 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also IBM Rational Service Tester Reviews, Visual Studio Test Professional Reviews, and our list of Best Functional Testing Tools Companies.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.