IBM Rational System Architect vs OpenText ProVision comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,534 views|844 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
219 views|142 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Rational System Architect and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Architecture Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Entrprsarch67
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There are a lot of features I find valuable, but I think that the metamodel customization is one of the best features that the solution offers.""The user interface is good. It's both clear and comprehensible. It's easy to work with.""We have seen ROI with this solution over the years that we have used it.""The solution is pretty stable."

More IBM Rational System Architect Pros →

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.""All the features come as part of a standard license.""The stability of the product is very good."

More OpenText ProVision Pros →

Cons
"The reverse engineering of the database is already there, but in the next release I would like to see some pilot supplied with the solution in order to address any database.""This solution can be more user-friendly and easier to use, with better dashboards.""The solution needs to better integrate with other products, like Microsoft.""There needs to be more information at the outset about how to use the solution and how to deploy it. The deployment process needs improvement."

More IBM Rational System Architect Cons →

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful.""Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments.""OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

More OpenText ProVision Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
Ranking
Views
1,534
Comparisons
844
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
219
Comparisons
142
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
197
Rating
5.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational System Architect
Metastorm ProVision
Learn More
Overview
IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture solution for visualizing, analyzing, and communicating enterprise architecture and business process analysis. This solution provides decision support, process optimization, and integration into solution delivery. Rational System Architect addresses all aspects of your organization's enterprise architecture, including modeling, publishing, analysis, and execution.
OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
Sample Customers
Wuxi Lake Cloud, Nationwide, ETI, IDS Scheer
Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Computer Software Company13%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company12%
Government8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Architecture Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational System Architect is ranked 20th in Enterprise Architecture Management while OpenText ProVision is ranked 24th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. IBM Rational System Architect is rated 7.4, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of IBM Rational System Architect writes "Modeling is useful, but many features need improvement and technical support is lacking". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". IBM Rational System Architect is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP PowerDesigner and UNICOM System Architect, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.