MartinMonteiroSr Domain Specialist at a healthcare company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We are on the Flex licenses."
"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."
"The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement."
"We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have."
"I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen."
"We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year."
"We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using."
"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational System Architect is ranked 13th in Architecture Management with 2 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 18th in Architecture Management. IBM Rational System Architect is rated 6.6, while QualiWare X is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational System Architect writes "Modeling is useful, but many features need improvement and technical support is lacking". On the other hand, IBM Rational System Architect is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, UNICOM System Architect, ARIS BPA and SAP PowerDesigner, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer, Avolution ABACUS, MEGA HOPEX and Ardoq.
See our list of best Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.