Compare IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server vs. Micro Focus Service Virtualization

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server vs. Micro Focus Service Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations.""As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."

More IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pros »

"The feature which is most valuable in this solution is the ease of use. The product is very easy to use and very easy to implement.""The most valuable feature is SAP virtualization."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Pros »

Cons
"User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS.""Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."

More IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Cons »

"The current protocol needs to be updated to be much more flexible. The product needs more technical flexibility in implementation and customization.""The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"IBM RTVS is not that expensive compare to other giants, but it is still much ahead of some other tool having less features.""The product has a free trial available, which has saves on the initial investment costs."

More IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Micro Service Virtualization is very expensive. The pricing of this product is in line with all of the other big name-brand products."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is SAP virtualization.
Top Answer: The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved.
Top Answer: We are a solution reseller and Micro Focus Service Virtualization is one of the products that we provide to our customers. There are many use cases and we have done a lot of work with this product… more »
Ranking
5th
Views
698
Comparisons
268
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
665
Rating
7.5
3rd
Views
1,023
Comparisons
400
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
595
Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Green Hat, IBM RTVS
HPE Service Virtualization
Learn More
Overview

Testing environments are often expensive and can have limited availability. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server helps you shift testing to the left by removing dependencies on components that are unavailable or already in use. These components are simulated at the API layer, supporting a wide variety of technologies, allowing your team to test the riskiest elements earlier in the delivery lifecycle.

Micro Focus Service Virtualization helps to simulate a services behavior in a production environment. This simulation software enables in-house development and testing teams to keep to their schedules regardless of access to production systems.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Virtualization
Sample Customers
Sandhata Technologies Ltd., Qantas Airways 
Virgin Media, TTNet
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider11%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
REVIEWERS
Retailer22%
Financial Services Firm22%
Media Company22%
Consumer Goods Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider11%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise64%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server vs. Micro Focus Service Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
523,742 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is ranked 5th in Service Virtualization with 2 reviews while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Service Virtualization with 2 reviews. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server writes "It helped us to build IBM MQ based stubs and automated test cases. I would like it to be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Virtualization writes "Easy to use, easy to implement, and it helps us to identify problems and create resolutions". IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization and SmartBear ServiceV Pro, whereas Micro Focus Service Virtualization is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization and SmartBear ServiceV Pro. See our IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server vs. Micro Focus Service Virtualization report.

See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.