Rekha ChotaraIT Analyst at Tata Consultancy Services
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations."
"As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."
"The feature which is most valuable in this solution is the ease of use. The product is very easy to use and very easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature is SAP virtualization."
"Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."
"The current protocol needs to be updated to be much more flexible. The product needs more technical flexibility in implementation and customization."
"The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved."
"IBM RTVS is not that expensive compare to other giants, but it is still much ahead of some other tool having less features."
"The product has a free trial available, which has saves on the initial investment costs."
"Micro Service Virtualization is very expensive. The pricing of this product is in line with all of the other big name-brand products."
Earn 20 points
Testing environments are often expensive and can have limited availability. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server helps you shift testing to the left by removing dependencies on components that are unavailable or already in use. These components are simulated at the API layer, supporting a wide variety of technologies, allowing your team to test the riskiest elements earlier in the delivery lifecycle.
Micro Focus Service Virtualization helps to simulate a services behavior in a production environment. This simulation software enables in-house development and testing teams to keep to their schedules regardless of access to production systems.
IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is ranked 5th in Service Virtualization with 2 reviews while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Service Virtualization with 2 reviews. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server writes "It helped us to build IBM MQ based stubs and automated test cases. I would like it to be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Virtualization writes "Easy to use, easy to implement, and it helps us to identify problems and create resolutions". IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization and SmartBear ServiceV Pro, whereas Micro Focus Service Virtualization is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization and SmartBear ServiceV Pro. See our IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server vs. Micro Focus Service Virtualization report.
See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.