Anonymous UserCyber Security Consultant at a tech services company
Anonymous UserInformation System Security Coordinator at a comms service provider
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"Its flexibility is the most valuable."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats."
"If you set it up right, it can really manage a very complex environment which require fine tuning where there are a lot of exceptions. That's what it caters to. It can just do those specifics in those exceptional situations, which is good."
"I really like the auditing component because it really looks at exactly what has happened on the network."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the antivirus and the DLP."
"The central manager policy means we have almost all client modules in one solution."
"From a single dashboard, I can take a look at several things including the endpoint protection, the file integrity section, the data activity monitor, and more."
"The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect."
"The implementation could be a bit simpler."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The product needs a bit more development."
"McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers."
"While there are bugs and a few functionality issues, it is just a matter of raising them with the support team. However, support is part of the problem as well. You want everything to be seamless in a perfect world, but the support is spread across different countries. They have Level 1, 2, and 3. Level 1 is most likely in a developing country. They don't provide the best service."
"They have to do something to make the solution more resilient or recoverable from power failure events, which may include creating their own database."
"The Virtual Patching feature needs to be improved."
"The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly."
"There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring."
"There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS."
"The solution sometimes has some false positives on IP addresses, from the web control aspect of the product. This needs to be improved."
"It is very expensive."
"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high."
"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."
"This solution is priced in the mid-range."
The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.
The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.
IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 5th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 9 reviews. IBM Resilient is rated 6.6, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Configure and deploy everything from a single web-based interface". IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Siemplify, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with McAfee MVISION ePO, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian. See our IBM Resilient vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.