Compare IBM Resilient vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar.""Its flexibility is the most valuable.""It's really simple and has a flexible interface.""The solution is very easy to use."

More IBM Resilient Pros »

"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats.""If you set it up right, it can really manage a very complex environment which require fine tuning where there are a lot of exceptions. That's what it caters to. It can just do those specifics in those exceptional situations, which is good.""I really like the auditing component because it really looks at exactly what has happened on the network.""The most valuable features of this solution are the antivirus and the DLP.""The central manager policy means we have almost all client modules in one solution.""From a single dashboard, I can take a look at several things including the endpoint protection, the file integrity section, the data activity monitor, and more.""The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect.""The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pros »

Cons
"The implementation could be a bit simpler.""Its price needs improvement.""The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions.""The product needs a bit more development."

More IBM Resilient Cons »

"McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers.""While there are bugs and a few functionality issues, it is just a matter of raising them with the support team. However, support is part of the problem as well. You want everything to be seamless in a perfect world, but the support is spread across different countries. They have Level 1, 2, and 3. Level 1 is most likely in a developing country. They don't provide the best service.""They have to do something to make the solution more resilient or recoverable from power failure events, which may include creating their own database.""The Virtual Patching feature needs to be improved.""The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly.""There is a problem when it comes to agent communication and duplicate records, where the rebooting of a machine leads to the installation of a new agent and you get a lot of duplicate records that ultimately affect your compliance monitoring.""There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS.""The solution sometimes has some false positives on IP addresses, from the web control aspect of the product. This needs to be improved."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Compared to other Antivirus products, the cost of this solution is a bit high.""McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it.""This solution is priced in the mid-range."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is very easy to use.
Top Answer: The pricing is pretty good, however, the downside is that it is not a very mature product. When a company needs a playbook, they have to create one, and then they have to pay someone for that service… more »
Top Answer: The product needs a bit more development. We've had some compatibility issues that need to be resolved. There needs to be a bit more research done into that to figure out why it won't work. For… more »
Top Answer: The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly.
Top Answer: Choose your anniversary cycle e.g. pay annually. You just pay for what you want your license to cover. It is modular. It depends on the feature you want. There's the firewall, DLP, drive encryption… more »
Top Answer: The product could have a single plug-in that would have multiple uses rather than a single plug-in which is used for a single purpose. Each aspect has a separate plug-in. They should concentrate on… more »
Ranking
Views
4,099
Comparisons
2,887
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
410
Rating
6.7
Views
3,265
Comparisons
1,690
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
504
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator
Learn More
Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Resilient
Learn more about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
Sample Customers
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm9%
Media Company5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider27%
Recruiting/Hr Firm18%
Financial Services Firm18%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise53%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 5th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 9 reviews. IBM Resilient is rated 6.6, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Configure and deploy everything from a single web-based interface". IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Siemplify, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with McAfee MVISION ePO, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian. See our IBM Resilient vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.