Compare IBM Resilient vs. McAfee MVISION ePO

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Resilient Logo
4,099 views|2,887 comparisons
McAfee MVISION ePO Logo
1,275 views|990 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: June 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar.""Its flexibility is the most valuable.""It's really simple and has a flexible interface.""The solution is very easy to use."

More IBM Resilient Pros »

"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pros »

Cons
"The implementation could be a bit simpler.""Its price needs improvement.""The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions.""The product needs a bit more development."

More IBM Resilient Cons »

"The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

More McAfee MVISION ePO Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is very easy to use.
Top Answer: The pricing is pretty good, however, the downside is that it is not a very mature product. When a company needs a playbook, they have to create one, and then they have to pay someone for that service… more »
Top Answer: The product needs a bit more development. We've had some compatibility issues that need to be resolved. There needs to be a bit more research done into that to figure out why it won't work. For… more »
Top Answer: What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console.
Top Answer: For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive. So people will… more »
Top Answer: The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path. There is a lot of different information all over the place and there's… more »
Ranking
Views
4,099
Comparisons
2,887
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
410
Rating
6.7
Views
1,275
Comparisons
990
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
924
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator, MVISION ePO, MVISION ePolicy Orchestrator
Learn More
Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

Cloud-based Security Management
Remove the setup and maintenance of on-premises security management infrastructure, so you can focus on monitoring your endpoints and mobile devices.

Enforce Security from a Single View
Easy-to-follow panels and dashboards assess your security posture. Stay current with summaries of the latest threat information and advisories.

Streamline Operations, Minimize Risk
Automated and straightforward workflows drive security operational efficiencies. Optional workflow approval requires policy or tasks to be reviewed, assuring higher-quality results.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Resilient
Learn more about McAfee MVISION ePO
Sample Customers
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm9%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company8%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: June 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews while McAfee MVISION ePO is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. IBM Resilient is rated 6.6, while McAfee MVISION ePO is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee MVISION ePO writes "Easy to set up and lets you centrally manage devices and endpoints from a single console". IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Siemplify, whereas McAfee MVISION ePO is most compared with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, Splunk Phantom and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.