Compare IBM Resilient vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar.""Its flexibility is the most valuable.""It's really simple and has a flexible interface.""The solution is very easy to use."

More IBM Resilient Pros »

"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.""The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pros »

Cons
"The implementation could be a bit simpler.""Its price needs improvement.""The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions.""The product needs a bit more development."

More IBM Resilient Cons »

"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners.""For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.""From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is very easy to use.
Top Answer: The pricing is pretty good, however, the downside is that it is not a very mature product. When a company needs a playbook, they have to create one, and then they have to pay someone for that service… more »
Top Answer: The product needs a bit more development. We've had some compatibility issues that need to be resolved. There needs to be a bit more research done into that to figure out why it won't work. For… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.
Top Answer: I think Swimlane is a better cost. It's small and doesn't focus on only integrating with it's own products like other XSoar competitors. 
Top Answer: Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners. It has to be richer with respect to IoT. I expect that in future versions… more »
Ranking
Views
4,195
Comparisons
3,020
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
410
Rating
6.7
Views
10,772
Comparisons
8,802
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
318
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
Learn More
Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Resilient
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Sample Customers
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews. IBM Resilient is rated 6.6, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Very scalable, awesome automation, and awesome technical support". IBM Resilient is most compared with Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR, Siemplify and SECDO Platform, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, Fortinet FortiSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Siemplify and Swimlane. See our IBM Resilient vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.