Anonymous UserCyber Security Consultant at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"Its flexibility is the most valuable."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration."
"The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work."
"The pricing is very good."
"The automation is excellent."
"The most valuable features are the orchestration because of the way in which it coordinates the loss from all the devices and it provides us with a high-level overview of the critical log information."
"The implementation could be a bit simpler."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The product needs a bit more development."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
"When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot."
"There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices."
"It is very expensive."
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions."
"From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."
"There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."
The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.
The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.
Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.
IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 5 reviews. IBM Resilient is rated 6.6, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "User-friendly and robust with good technical support". IBM Resilient is most compared with Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR, Siemplify and SECDO Platform, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, Fortinet FortiSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Siemplify and Swimlane. See our IBM Resilient vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR report.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.