Compare IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Resilient Logo
4,099 views|2,887 comparisons
ThreatConnect Logo
3,256 views|2,549 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,882 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar.""Its flexibility is the most valuable.""It's really simple and has a flexible interface.""The solution is very easy to use."

More IBM Resilient Pros »

"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it.""ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."

More ThreatConnect Pros »

Cons
"The implementation could be a bit simpler.""Its price needs improvement.""The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions.""The product needs a bit more development."

More IBM Resilient Cons »

"Integration is an area that could use some improvement.""They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"

More ThreatConnect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive.""The price could be better."

More ThreatConnect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
510,882 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is very easy to use.
Top Answer: The pricing is pretty good, however, the downside is that it is not a very mature product. When a company needs a playbook, they have to create one, and then they have to pay someone for that service… more »
Top Answer: The product needs a bit more development. We've had some compatibility issues that need to be resolved. There needs to be a bit more research done into that to figure out why it won't work. For… more »
Top Answer: ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface.
Top Answer: The price could be better. ThreatConnect is very expensive for a single user, but it maybe affordable for companies.
Top Answer: They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community. Right now, it's a little complex to share with them or to download your events in a report. The price… more »
Ranking
Views
4,099
Comparisons
2,887
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
410
Rating
6.7
Views
3,256
Comparisons
2,549
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
282
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

The ThreatConnect Platform was designed to help you understand adversaries, automate workflows, and mitigate threats using threat intelligence. ThreatConnect offers a suite of products built on platform of analytics and automation.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Resilient
Learn more about ThreatConnect
Sample Customers
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
GoDaddy, BWM Outcomes, LLC, ND-ISAC, Zurich NA, Raytheon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm9%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
510,882 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews while ThreatConnect is ranked 8th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews. IBM Resilient is rated 6.6, while ThreatConnect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect writes "Ease to use, customizable, and they have responsive and knowledgeable support". IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Carbon Black CB Response, whereas ThreatConnect is most compared with Anomali Enterprise, ThreatQ, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Fortinet FortiSOAR. See our IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.