Compare IBM Resilient vs. ThreatQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Resilient Logo
4,099 views|2,887 comparisons
ThreatQ Logo
1,337 views|956 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar.""Its flexibility is the most valuable.""It's really simple and has a flexible interface.""The solution is very easy to use."

More IBM Resilient Pros »

"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."

More ThreatQ Pros »

Cons
"The implementation could be a bit simpler.""Its price needs improvement.""The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions.""The product needs a bit more development."

More IBM Resilient Cons »

"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."

More ThreatQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is very easy to use.
Top Answer: The pricing is pretty good, however, the downside is that it is not a very mature product. When a company needs a playbook, they have to create one, and then they have to pay someone for that service… more »
Top Answer: The product needs a bit more development. We've had some compatibility issues that need to be resolved. There needs to be a bit more research done into that to figure out why it won't work. For… more »
Top Answer: The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized… more »
Top Answer: I'm not sure if the solution is currently missing any features. I haven't noticed anything that could be added. The biggest challenge is the deployment. The installation of the ThreatQ only takes the… more »
Top Answer: Initially, the solution was assigned to just extract the reports we needed. We just integrated our threat feed URLs to the ThreatQ platform. We could create a report which was like a categorized… more »
Ranking
Views
4,099
Comparisons
2,887
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
410
Rating
6.7
Views
1,337
Comparisons
956
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
767
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Resilient
Learn more about ThreatQ
Sample Customers
Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm9%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Resilient is ranked 7th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 11th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. IBM Resilient is rated 6.6, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Siemplify, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform, IntSights and EclecticIQ.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.