We performed a comparison between IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Nintex RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM Robotic Process Automation is very easy to use."
"It's not inclusive, in terms of automation, you can just do it standalone, in its own silo. It's not going to force your existing system or teams, your admin teams, to create new IDs for you or even force them to create new services or APIs for you or expose something from there. They can just keep the way they are doing it right now, but you still automate it."
"The good stuff about IBM is the fact that it's very easy to use, there are very nice and smart AI tools within the licensing that you don't have to pay any access. Moreover, it's more precise and more secure."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"I think simplicity is key. One of the things that we've noticed is how our developers have been able to quickly adopt the platform; but not only the developers or the techy people, also the business."
"If you have a business process, and once you have automated that process, you have a readily available workflow in place."
"Nintex RPA doesn't require much coding, and you can drag and drop the activities."
"Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"We can use its inbuilt activities, and it's a complete package, but just like ElectroNeek, a limitation is that we have to depend on its inbuilt activities. We can't include our own activities or we can't introduce other activities."
"The scalability of the solution can be challenging."
"One of the things I would definitely like to see is more of the machine-learning and cognitive capabilities. For example, now that we're starting to automate more and more tasks, there are some things that still require us to go back and modify the robots when we need to. But if we had more of the machine-learning integrated into it, I believe it would be easier to maintain, so that we wouldn't have to go back and adjust every time."
"The product must be promoted more."
"This RPA should be under the umbrella of BPM. This is what the future should be."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation should be more stable."
"We are looking to see how it can connect with various interfaces seamlessly, through APIs."
"I would like to improve the efficiency of this solution and the Surface Level Agreement."
"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."
"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."
"Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills."
More IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 23 reviews while Nintex RPA is ranked 24th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is rated 8.2, while Nintex RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) writes "User-friendly interface and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex RPA writes "Stable product with an easy-to-understand user interface". IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism and IPsoft 1RPA, whereas Nintex RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Kryon RPA and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vs. Nintex RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
