We performed a comparison between IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Tricentis RPA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."I think simplicity is key. One of the things that we've noticed is how our developers have been able to quickly adopt the platform; but not only the developers or the techy people, also the business."
"The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."
"It's not inclusive, in terms of automation, you can just do it standalone, in its own silo. It's not going to force your existing system or teams, your admin teams, to create new IDs for you or even force them to create new services or APIs for you or expose something from there. They can just keep the way they are doing it right now, but you still automate it."
"The solution is scalability."
"If you have a business process, and once you have automated that process, you have a readily available workflow in place."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The quality is great! It's very strong and has a very strong platform."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation is very easy to use."
"I like that it's user-friendly and easy for beginners to understand. It's not complex."
"We're based in Thailand, but the documentation is not in Thai, which makes it difficult for us. If they could translate all of their documentation into our language, we'd be very grateful."
"The product's document readers must be improved to capture the data well."
"Extensibility is the key, especially in terms of the Recorders feature that we have. That should be browser independent. Enhance it because some people have Chrome, some have Internet Explorer, etc. Also, integration with PDFs: Not just the ability to read information from PDFs but the ability to write information from PDFs, make it secure, sign it, etc. Finally, if they can allow a token exchange inside the tool itself, that would help."
"We are looking to see how it can connect with various interfaces seamlessly, through APIs."
"IBM should provide specific solutions for specific problems, like templates for invoicing processes, or general templates for creating efficient processes."
"I would like to have more flexibility in connecting the platform with third-party systems."
"We can use its inbuilt activities, and it's a complete package, but just like ElectroNeek, a limitation is that we have to depend on its inbuilt activities. We can't include our own activities or we can't introduce other activities."
"We would like a decreased need for customer support."
"The setup is complicated, it should be simplified."
More IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 23 reviews while Tricentis RPA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is rated 8.2, while Tricentis RPA [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) writes "User-friendly interface and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis RPA [EOL] writes "Is user-friendly and easy for beginners to understand". IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism and IPsoft 1RPA, whereas Tricentis RPA [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
