IBM Safer Payments vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,288 views|779 comparisons
SAS Logo
1,206 views|671 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Safer Payments and SAS Fraud Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
  • More SAS Fraud Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    1,288
    Comparisons
    779
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,206
    Comparisons
    671
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adapt faster to changing threats and new products by dramatically shrinking the time it takes to test and deploy new profiles, rules, and models. Using a unique cognitive computing approach, IBM Safer Payments profiles the behavior of any entity and delivers best-fit analytics interactively to fraud professionals. This proven technology is already protecting some of the world's largest and most complex payment portfolios. Outthink fraud by rethinking detection.

    Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

    Sample Customers
    Borgun
    Nets
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Computer Software Company19%
    University4%
    Media Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Safer Payments is ranked 9th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 11th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. IBM Safer Payments is rated 0.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". IBM Safer Payments is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Trusteer, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management, IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) and ThreatMetrix.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.