Compare IBM Safer Payments vs. SAS Fraud Management
Most Helpful Review | |
Use IBM Safer Payments? Share your opinion. | |
 Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2020. 456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs. 456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 855 Comparisons 619 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 714 Comparisons 584 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 650 Rating 9.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 27% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. |  Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time. Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. |
Learn | |
| IBM | SAS |
Overview | |
Adapt faster to changing threats and new products by dramatically shrinking the time it takes to test and deploy new profiles, rules, and models. Using a unique cognitive computing approach, IBM Safer Payments profiles the behavior of any entity and delivers best-fit analytics interactively to fraud professionals. This proven technology is already protecting some of the world's largest and most complex payment portfolios. Outthink fraud by rethinking detection. | Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Safer Payments | Learn more about SAS Fraud Management |
Sample Customers | |
| Borgun | Nets |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company40% Financial Services Firm24% Comms Service Provider18% Government5% | Computer Software Company40% Media Company15% Financial Services Firm14% Comms Service Provider9% |
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2020.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Safer Payments is ranked 12th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while SAS Fraud Management is ranked 7th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review. IBM Safer Payments is rated 0.0, while SAS Fraud Management is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Fraud Management writes "Monitor multiple channels with a single platform". IBM Safer Payments is most compared with IBM Trusteer, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and SecureBank, whereas SAS Fraud Management is most compared with FICO Falcon Platform, BAE Systems NetReveal, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.