Compare IBM SAN32B-E4 vs. IBM SAN40B-4

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM SAN32B-E4 Logo
25 views|12 comparisons
IBM SAN40B-4 Logo
42 views|24 comparisons
Ranking
13th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
25
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
12th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
42
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN32B-E4SAN40B-4
Learn
IBM
IBM
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN32B-E4 is designed to deliver fabric-based encryption services, providing up to 96 Gbps of encryption processing for disk and 48 Gbps of compression and encryption processing for tape.The IBM System Storage SAN40B-4 SAN fabric switch provides 24, 32 or 40 active ports and is designed for high performance with 8 Gbps link speeds and backward compatibility to support links running at 4, 2 and 1 Gbps link speeds. High availability features make it suitable for use as a core switch in midrange environments or as an edge-switch in enterprise environments where a wide range of storage area network (SAN) infrastructure simplification and business continuity configurations are possible.
Offer
Learn more about IBM SAN32B-E4
Learn more about IBM SAN40B-4
Sample Customers
Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A., L'Or_al S.A., Vaasan Oy, IBM Systems and Technology Group, OdinCosan, EF Education First, Intesa Sanpaolo Assicura S.p.A., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, American National Bank
IBM SAN32B-E4 is ranked 13th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN40B-4 is ranked 12th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN32B-E4 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN40B-4 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN32B-E4 is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN40B-4 is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.