• Home
  • IBM SAN32B-E4 vs. Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System

IBM SAN32B-E4 vs Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Use IBM SAN32B-E4?
Anonymous User
Has a fantastic feature-set and works well with workflow solutions
Ranking
11th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
23
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
28
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN32B-E4
Learn More
IBM
Oracle
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN32B-E4 is designed to deliver fabric-based encryption services, providing up to 96 Gbps of encryption processing for disk and 48 Gbps of compression and encryption processing for tape.

The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, Oracle’s premier preferred SAN storage solution, delivers enterprise-grade storage capabilities that are optimized for flash media and coengineered with Oracle software. Using the Quality of Service Plus (QoS Plus) feature, the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system places data across flash and disk storage to maximize performance, efficiency, and cost based on usage profiles and business priorities. The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system takes application-engineered storage to a new level by providing out-of-the-box tuned storage provisioning profiles for Oracle Database and key applications, including Microsoft SharePoint and Exchange, and VMware support including VAAI. With the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, you can consolidate storage while achieving predictable performance for multiple diverse workloads in enterprise computing or multitenant environments.

Sample Customers
Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A., L'Or_al S.A., Vaasan Oy, IBM Systems and Technology Group, Odin
Enterprise Strategy Group, Groupe AGRICA, Keolis, Dragon Slayer Consultant

IBM SAN32B-E4 is ranked 11th in Enterprise SAN while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is ranked 10th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN32B-E4 is rated 0.0, while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System writes "Has a fantastic feature-set and works well with workflow solutions". IBM SAN32B-E4 is most compared with , whereas Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is most compared with Dell Unity XT.

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.