• Home
  • IBM SAN384B vs. IBM SAN768B

IBM SAN384B vs IBM SAN768B comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM SAN384B

234 views|191 comparisons
IBM Logo

IBM SAN768B

18 views|11 comparisons
Ranking
5th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
234
Comparisons
191
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
18
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN384B
SAN768B
Learn More
IBM
IBM
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN384B fabric backbone is a core and edge network switching platform designed for midrange to enterprise-level Storage Area Network (SAN) applications. It features multiprotocol architecture, high performance, and scalable design:
  • 8 Gbps industry-standard Fibre Channel (FC) switch capability for systems that support 8 Gbps throughput
  • Auto sensing FC ports supporting 1 Gbps, 2 Gbps, 4 Gbps, and 8 Gbps
  • Up to 384, 8 Gbps user ports connected in a dual core with the use of Inter-Chassis Links (ICLs), and up to 192 ports in a single domain
  • High-performance port and switching blades
IBM System Storage SAN768B fabric backbones is a Fibre Channel switching infrastructure offerings that provide the foundation for reliable, scalable, high-performance storage. The System Storage SAN b-type family switch leverages Gen 5 Fibre Channel and Fabric Vision technology to deliver long-term solutions for mission-critical applications that require secure, high-performance, low-latency storage networks.
Sample Customers
Tabicel, Sanmarco Informatica, National Institutes of Health, Chapman University, Baldor Electric, University of New Brunswick, Harim Group Corp.
Einstein Healthcare, Hansgrohe SE, Yaap Digital Services

IBM SAN384B is ranked 5th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN768B is ranked 14th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN384B is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN768B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN384B is most compared with IBM SAN48B-5 and Cisco MDS Series, whereas IBM SAN768B is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.