IBM SAN40B-4 vs IBM SAN768B comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
22 views|9 comparisons
IBM Logo
18 views|11 comparisons
Ranking
13th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
22
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
18
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN40B-4
SAN768B
Learn More
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN40B-4 SAN fabric switch provides 24, 32 or 40 active ports and is designed for high performance with 8 Gbps link speeds and backward compatibility to support links running at 4, 2 and 1 Gbps link speeds. High availability features make it suitable for use as a core switch in midrange environments or as an edge-switch in enterprise environments where a wide range of storage area network (SAN) infrastructure simplification and business continuity configurations are possible.
IBM System Storage SAN768B fabric backbones is a Fibre Channel switching infrastructure offerings that provide the foundation for reliable, scalable, high-performance storage. The System Storage SAN b-type family switch leverages Gen 5 Fibre Channel and Fabric Vision technology to deliver long-term solutions for mission-critical applications that require secure, high-performance, low-latency storage networks.
Sample Customers
Cosan, EF Education First, Intesa Sanpaolo Assicura S.p.A., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, American National Bank
Einstein Healthcare, Hansgrohe SE, Yaap Digital Services

IBM SAN40B-4 is ranked 13th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN768B is ranked 14th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN40B-4 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN768B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN40B-4 is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN768B is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.