Compare IBM SAN40B-4 vs. IBM SAN80B-4

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM SAN40B-4 Logo
42 views|24 comparisons
IBM SAN80B-4 Logo
42 views|26 comparisons
Ranking
12th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
42
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
11th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
42
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN40B-4SAN80B-4
Learn
IBM
IBM
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN40B-4 SAN fabric switch provides 24, 32 or 40 active ports and is designed for high performance with 8 Gbps link speeds and backward compatibility to support links running at 4, 2 and 1 Gbps link speeds. High availability features make it suitable for use as a core switch in midrange environments or as an edge-switch in enterprise environments where a wide range of storage area network (SAN) infrastructure simplification and business continuity configurations are possible.The IBM 2498 SAN80B-4 Model B80 is a high-performance 8 Gbps FC switch designed for enterprise environments that require a high-port-count footprint for port aggregation and a simplified management environment that comes from reducing the total number of domains.
Offer
Learn more about IBM SAN40B-4
Learn more about IBM SAN80B-4
Sample Customers
Cosan, EF Education First, Intesa Sanpaolo Assicura S.p.A., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, American National BankCity of Joensuu, Six Flags Entertainment, VolkerHighways, Front-Safe A/S, DLF Ltd., Clinica Las Condes
IBM SAN40B-4 is ranked 12th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN80B-4 is ranked 11th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN40B-4 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN80B-4 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN40B-4 is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN80B-4 is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.