• Home
  • IBM SAN40B-4 vs. Lenovo Storage V Series

IBM SAN40B-4 vs Lenovo Storage V Series comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
13th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
22
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
55
Comparisons
43
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN40B-4
Learn More
IBM
Lenovo
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN40B-4 SAN fabric switch provides 24, 32 or 40 active ports and is designed for high performance with 8 Gbps link speeds and backward compatibility to support links running at 4, 2 and 1 Gbps link speeds. High availability features make it suitable for use as a core switch in midrange environments or as an edge-switch in enterprise environments where a wide range of storage area network (SAN) infrastructure simplification and business continuity configurations are possible.

The enterprise data storage market is changing at a rapid pace and organizations of all sizes are experiencing IT operational challenges. Businesses now need greater data collaboration, agility and cost efficiency to stay ahead of the competition. The right infrastructure allows clients to share information, secure transactions and drive real-time insights.

Sample Customers
Cosan, EF Education First, Intesa Sanpaolo Assicura S.p.A., Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, American National Bank
Information Not Available

IBM SAN40B-4 is ranked 13th in Enterprise SAN while Lenovo Storage V Series is ranked 9th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN40B-4 is rated 0.0, while Lenovo Storage V Series is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN40B-4 is most compared with , whereas Lenovo Storage V Series is most compared with Dell PowerVault.

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.