Compare IBM Security Access Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security.""It's a good solution for identification and access management."

More IBM Security Access Manager Pros »

"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs.""The single sign-on feature is excellent.""The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."

More NetIQ Access Manager Pros »

Cons
"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user.""The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

More IBM Security Access Manager Cons »

"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization.""I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance.""In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."

More NetIQ Access Manager Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database.
Top Answer: In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device.
Top Answer: Our primary use cases include creating the security patch, control over access, simplifying the control of the organization's access to infrastructureת and obligation services. We provide account… more »
Ranking
13th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
1,397
Comparisons
1,171
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
227
Rating
7.5
14th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
301
Comparisons
163
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
400
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ISAM
Learn More
Overview

IBM Security Access Manager helps you simplify your users' access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. ISAM helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with IBM Security Access Manager.

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Security Access Manager
Learn more about NetIQ Access Manager
Sample Customers
POST Luxembourg
Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Insurance Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm11%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Security Access Manager is ranked 13th in Access Management with 2 reviews while NetIQ Access Manager is ranked 14th in Access Management with 3 reviews. IBM Security Access Manager is rated 7.6, while NetIQ Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Access Manager writes "Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Good authentication and great single sign-on feature but needs a better upgrade procedure". IBM Security Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Azure Active Directory, F5 Access Policy Manager, Oracle Access Manager and Auth0, whereas NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity. See our IBM Security Access Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.