SylvainMaertchikEducation Director at ID Integrated Data SA
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."
"It's a good solution for identification and access management."
"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs."
"The single sign-on feature is excellent."
"The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."
"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."
"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."
"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."
"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."
Earn 20 points
IBM Security Access Manager helps you simplify your users' access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. ISAM helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with IBM Security Access Manager.
IBM Security Access Manager is ranked 13th in Access Management with 2 reviews while NetIQ Access Manager is ranked 14th in Access Management with 3 reviews. IBM Security Access Manager is rated 7.6, while NetIQ Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Access Manager writes "Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Good authentication and great single sign-on feature but needs a better upgrade procedure". IBM Security Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Azure Active Directory, F5 Access Policy Manager, Oracle Access Manager and Auth0, whereas NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity. See our IBM Security Access Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.