Compare IBM Security Access Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager

IBM Security Access Manager is ranked 14th in Access Management with 2 reviews while NetIQ Access Manager is ranked 13th in Access Management with 1 review. IBM Security Access Manager is rated 7.6, while NetIQ Access Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security Access Manager writes "Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Easy to integrate with lots of different applications". IBM Security Access Manager is most compared with Okta, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and ForgeRock, whereas NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with CA SSO and Oracle Access Manager.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Security Access Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, Microsoft and others in Access Management. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It's a good solution for identification and access management.The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security.

Read more »

There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs.

Read more »

Cons
The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly.Configuration could be simplified for the end-user.

Read more »

The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
355
Comparisons
289
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
227
Avg. Rating
7.5
13th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
276
Comparisons
142
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
392
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 56% of the time.
Also Known As
ISAM
Learn
IBM
Micro Focus
Overview

IBM Security Access Manager helps you simplify your users' access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. ISAM helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with IBM Security Access Manager.

Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Security Access Manager
Learn more about NetIQ Access Manager
Sample Customers
POST LuxembourgBancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, Microsoft and others in Access Management. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.