Compare IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server
IBM Security Access Manager is ranked 14th in Access Management with 2 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 11th in Access Management with 2 reviews. IBM Security Access Manager is rated 7.6, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Access Manager writes "Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "A stable solution for single sign-on and role-based permissions". IBM Security Access Manager is most compared with Okta, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and ForgeRock, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with OpenIAM, Okta and ForgeRock. See our IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.
Most Helpful Review | |
Use IBM Security Access Manager? Share your opinion. | |
 Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020. 406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
It's a good solution for identification and access management. The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security. | I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten. Comprehensive ecosystem. |
Cons | |
The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly. Configuration could be simplified for the end-user. | The high availability architecture has to be improved. I found the initial setup to be very complex. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs. 406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 355 Comparisons 289 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 227 Avg. Rating 7.5 | Views 2,186 Comparisons 1,598 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 595 Avg. Rating 7.5 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 38% of the time.  Compared 31% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. |  Compared 27% of the time. Compared 13% of the time. Compared 12% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| ISAM | |
Learn | |
| IBM | WSO2 |
Overview | |
IBM Security Access Manager helps you simplify your users' access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. ISAM helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with IBM Security Access Manager. | WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Security Access Manager | Learn more about WSO2 Identity Server |
Sample Customers | |
| POST Luxembourg | Nutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360 |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Software R&D Company51% Comms Service Provider14% Government7% Media Company7% |
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also IBM Security Access Manager Reviews, WSO2 Identity Server Reviews, and our list of Best Access Management Companies.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.