Compare IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server

IBM Security Access Manager is ranked 14th in Access Management with 2 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 11th in Access Management with 2 reviews. IBM Security Access Manager is rated 7.6, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Access Manager writes "Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "A stable solution for single sign-on and role-based permissions". IBM Security Access Manager is most compared with Okta, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and ForgeRock, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with OpenIAM, Okta and ForgeRock. See our IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Security Access Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It's a good solution for identification and access management.The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security.

Read more »

I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten.Comprehensive ecosystem.

Read more »

Cons
The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly.Configuration could be simplified for the end-user.

Read more »

The high availability architecture has to be improved.I found the initial setup to be very complex.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
355
Comparisons
289
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
227
Avg. Rating
7.5
11th
out of 28 in Access Management
Views
2,186
Comparisons
1,598
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
595
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
ISAM
Learn
IBM
WSO2
Overview

IBM Security Access Manager helps you simplify your users' access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. ISAM helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with IBM Security Access Manager.

WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Security Access Manager
Learn more about WSO2 Identity Server
Sample Customers
POST LuxembourgNutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company51%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government7%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Access Manager vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.