IBM Security AppScan vs. Kiuwan

As of May 2019, IBM Security AppScan is ranked 5th in Application Security with 14 reviews vs Kiuwan which is ranked 9th in Application Security with 6 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Security AppScan writes "The ease of use is key, the developers can actually use it and get results from dynamic testing". The top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Adds value to our customers to validate what they receive". IBM Security AppScan is most compared with Veracode, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand and Checkmarx. Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode and Checkmarx. See our IBM Security AppScan vs. Kiuwan report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Security AppScan Logo
18,893 views|9,307 comparisons
Kiuwan Logo
6,515 views|3,482 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security AppScan vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
340,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This solution saves us time due to the low number of false positives detected.The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well.It provides a better integration for our ecosystem.You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI.We leverage it as a quality check against code.We are now deploying less defects to production.Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production.It has certainly helped us find vulnerabilities in our software, so this is priceless in the end.

Read more »

I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance.​We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities.Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices.Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP.I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable.

Read more »

Cons
IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications.There is not a central management for static and dynamic.Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners do not know we have integrations with some of IBM products.I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources.I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers.​IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use​.There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. ​It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good.

Read more »

Perhaps more languages supported.The development-to-delivery phase.DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on.I would like to see additional languages supported.The QA developer and security could be improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost.

Read more »

I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did.Nothing special. It's a very fair model.Check with your account manager.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
340,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
Views
18,893
Comparisons
9,307
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
402
Avg. Rating
7.9
9th
Views
6,515
Comparisons
3,482
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
255
Avg. Rating
9.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 56% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
Rational AppScan, AppScan
Learn
IBM
Kiuwan
Overview

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Security AppScan
Learn more about Kiuwan
Sample Customers
Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS ITDHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government29%
Financial Services Firm14%
Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government26%
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company13%
Transportation Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Pharma/Biotech Company15%
Software R&D Company15%
Comms Service Provider15%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise98%
REVIEWERS
Small Business60%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise30%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security AppScan vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
340,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email