Most Helpful Review
The static scans are good, and the SaaS as well.
It provides a better integration for our ecosystem.
You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI.
We leverage it as a quality check against code.
We are now deploying less defects to production.
Usually when we deploy the application, there is a process for ethical hacking. The main benefit is that, the ethical hacking is almost clean, every time. So it's less cost, less effort, less time to production.
It has certainly helped us find vulnerabilities in our software, so this is priceless in the end.
I like the recording feature.
Veracode provides faster scans compared to other static analysis security testing tools.
It has almost completely eliminated the presence of SQLi vulnerabilities.
It gives feedback to developers on the effectiveness of their secure coding practices.
We use Veracode static analysis during development to eliminate vulnerability issues
I have found the user interface extremely helpful in prioritizing issues.
Allows us to track the remediation and handling of identified vulnerabilities.
Provides the capability to track remediation and the handling of identified vulnerabilities.
The security team can track the remediation and risk acceptance statistics.
There is not a central management for static and dynamic.
Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners do not know we have integrations with some of IBM products.
I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources.
I would love to see more containers. Many of the tools are great, they require an amount of configuration, setup and infrastructure. If most the applications were in a container, I think everything would be a little bit faster, because all our clients are now using containers.
IBM Security AppScan Source is rather hard to use.
There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost.
It's a little bit basic when you talk about the Web Services. If AppScan improved its maturity on Web Services testing, that would be good.
I think being able to search across more containers, especially some of the docker elements. We need a little tighter integration there. That's the only thing I can see at this point.
Veracode scans provide a higher number of false positives.
The overall reporting structure is complicated, and it's difficult to understand the report.
It needs more timely support for newer languages and framework versions.
They should improve on the static scanning time.
The solution does not support Dynamic Application Security Testing.
The current version of the application does not support testing for API.
We would like the consolidation of all the different modules. This would help, so then we would be able to see analytics and results on one screen, like a single pane of glass.
Once your report has been generated, you need to review the report with consultation team, especially if it is too detailed on the development side or regarding the language. Then, you need some professional help from their end to help you understand whatever has been identified. Scheduling consultation takes a longer time. So, if you are running multiple reports at the same time, then you need to schedule a multiple consultation times with one of their developers. There are few developers on their end who work can work with your developers, and their schedules are very tight.
Pricing and Cost Advice
AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost.
It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.
I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.
Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.
I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.
Regarding licensing, pay very close attention to what applications you're going to need to do dynamic scanning for, versus static. Right now, the way the licensing is set up, if you don't have any static elements for a website, you can certainly avoid some costs by doing more dynamic licenses. You need to pay very close attention to that, because if you find out later that you have static code elements - like Java scripts, etc. - that you want to have scanned statically, having the two licenses bundled together will actually save you money.
We're very comfortable with their model. We think they're a good value. We worked very closely with Veracode on understanding their license model, understanding what comprises the fee and what does not. With their assistance in design, we decomposed our application in a way where we are scanning a very significant amount of code without wasting their capacity and generating redundant reported issues. You scan in profiles, per se. And we work with them, in their offices, to design the most effective approach. So the advice I would have for customers is, you can get up and live fast, but work closely with Veracode to refine the method you use for scanning and the way you compile the applications. There's a concept called entry-point scanning, and that's probably not used well by the rest of their customers. We see our licensing as a good value because we leverage it heavily.
Pricing/licensing is complicated.
Negotiate some, but their prices are reasonable.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
See more IBM Security AppScan competitors »
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
See more Veracode competitors »
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
|Also Known As||Rational AppScan, AppScan|
IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.
Veracode is an application security company that offers an automated cloud-based service for securing web, mobile and third-party enterprise applications. Veracode provides multiple security analysis technologies on a single platform, including static analysis, dynamic analysis, mobile application behavioral analysis and software composition analysis.
Learn more about IBM Security AppScan
Learn more about Veracode
|Sample Customers||Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT||State of Missouri, Rekner|
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
VISITORS READING REVIEWS