Compare IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence vs. One Identity Active Roles

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Oracle and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: December 2020.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships.""The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.""Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want."

More Omada Identity Pros »

"Lifecycle management, governance and documentation."

More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Pros »

"It's valuable to us in that it resembles the native tools that most people have grown accustomed to... Active Roles resembles traditional tools, such as from Microsoft. That is really good because it eases the way people interact with the tool.""The AD and AAD management features of this solution are really good... They offer added value by showing more fields such as password age and the statuses of some things that we normally wouldn't see.""It gives us attribute-level control and the AD management features work very well.""The provisioning and deprovisioning saves a lot of time and skips a lot of errors.""Having a tool to manage all changes to AD from a single pane of glass is awesome.""The biggest thing for us is Active Roles saves a lot of man-hours in keeping groups up-to-date manually or trying to write some sort of script that you have to run, so we don't have to reinvent the wheel. Instead of when every time somebody joins a department, then somebody has to remember to put in a request to add "meet user Joe" to this group, the solution does it automatically for us. Therefore, it saves our business and IT staff time because they do not have to process requests since Active Role can do it for them.""Because of Active Roles, we're able to synchronize on an even more regular basis. It enables us to provide even more information to the Active Directory, which helped us to group our users in a more consistent manner.""Another good feature is the change history. It's centralized in a single place and allows us to manage people's Active Directory domains from a central location. We can also drill down into individual objects in a troubleshooting or even an auditing situation. We can show evidence to auditors by drilling down into the individual history. It gives you all the history of what happened around an individual object. That is something that would be almost impossible to do in Active Directory, or extremely complicated."

More One Identity Active Roles Pros »

Cons
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement.""When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides."

More Omada Identity Cons »

"Self service center is not always easy to understand."

More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Cons »

"It also has workflows and those are really powerful, but there are no built-in workflows. When it comes to them, it's empty. I would personally love for it to come with ten, 15, or 20 workflows where each achieves a certain task... I could just look at how each is done, clone them, copy them, modify them the way I want them, and be good to go. Right now we have to invent things from scratch.""Most of the time it just works.""For the AAD management feature, it needs to improve the objects that we can manage and the security.""The ability to send logs to a SIEM would be very beneficial.""When doing a workflow, we would like a bit better feedback on the screen, as we're trying to get it to work. For example, there is a "Find" function that you need set up in a workflow to do some of the automation. It is not the easiest to get a result from those finds when you're trying to do that. In the MMC, they have a couple different types of workflows. In this particular case, we use their workflow functionality to find all of X within the environment, then if you find it, do X, Y, and Z. You can have multiple steps. When you do that search function within that workflow, it's really hard to find out, "Is my search working?" It would be nice if there was some feedback on the screen so you could see if your search is working properly within the workflow.""In terms of improvement, it could be made even more user-friendly for administrators when they need to create new workflows and rule sets.""The third area for improvement, which is the weakest portion of ARS, is the workflow engine, which was introduced a few years ago. It's slow and not very intuitive to use, so I would like to see improvement there.""There are some features that we think should be included in their next release. We think these things would take them to the next level: the ability to completely force or limit any dynamic group processing to specific servers, change-tracking reporting of virtual attributes, and the ability to use files as inputs to automation workloads. These things have also been talked about. Knowing them, they're probably working on them."

More One Identity Active Roles Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.
Top Answer: Licenses are only for installations and support problems. They are definitely additional costs.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, there are not so many out of the box connectors available in the current version. So what they… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Omada Identity SuiteIGI, IBM Security Identity Manager, ISIMQuest Active Roles
Learn
Omada
IBM
One Identity
Overview

Omada Identity Suite Core identity management and access governance functionality in one integrated solution. High-Level Identity Management and Access Governance Functionality Omada's Identity Suite delivers a fully featured process framework for core identity management and access governance functionalities, that improves IT security, ensures compliance control, and enables business efficiency.

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence (IGI) delivers a business-centric approach to Identity Management and Governance. It empowers business and IT to work together to meet regulatory compliance and security goals across enterprise applications and data. IGI covers enterprise user lifecycle management, access risk assessment and mitigation, certification, password management as well as powerful analytics and reporting to enable business to make the right decisions on enterprise access.

Active Roles is a single, unified and rich tool to automate the most troublesome user and group management tasks. With One Identity Active Roles, you can streamline user and group administration, solve security issues – and meet those never-ending compliance requirements by managing and securing on-prem, and cloud AD resources simply and efficiently with a single, intuitive solution.

Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence
Learn more about One Identity Active Roles
Sample Customers
ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, Krka, Bayer, NuStar Energy, DuPontE.ON Global CommoditiesCity of Frankfurt, Moore Public Schools, George Washington University, Transavia Airlines, Howard County, MD. See all stories at OneIdentity.com/casestudies
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider13%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
REVIEWERS
Aerospace/Defense Firm29%
Comms Service Provider14%
Consumer Goods Company14%
Manufacturing Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Large Enterprise64%
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Oracle and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: December 2020.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is ranked 11th in User Provisioning Software with 1 review while One Identity Active Roles is ranked 3rd in User Provisioning Software with 8 reviews. IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is rated 7.0, while One Identity Active Roles is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence writes "Clear evaluation and life cycle management; service center could be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Active Roles writes "ARS has been instrumental in ensuring accounts get cleaned up when they get deprovisioned". IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, OpenIAM Identity Governance, CyberArk PAS, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Saviynt, whereas One Identity Active Roles is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Okta Workforce Identity and Softerra Adaxes.

See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.