Compare IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence? Share your opinion.
Use RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Microsoft and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships.""The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.""Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want."

More Omada Identity Pros »

"Lifecycle management, governance and documentation."

More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support.""The governance aspect in general is great."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pros »

Cons
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement.""When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version.""The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides."

More Omada Identity Cons »

"Self service center is not always easy to understand."

More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Cons »

"Technical support in Pakistan can be improved.""the user interface could be slightly improved."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The initial total cost of ownership to implement Omada Identity is not small. The TCO for the implementation is as high as any other solution. However, the cost of maintaining the solution is at par or lower than competitors, including adding more features or maintaining the system after the initial deployment or installation to make sure that they are available for users to use or extending the functionalities of those activities. Those maintenance costs are lower than other vendors, but the initial cost of getting the system installed is still high."

More Omada Identity Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"There are many more expensive products on the market, so the pricing is good"

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology.
Top Answer: Licenses are only for installations and support problems. They are definitely additional costs.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, there are not so many out of the box connectors available in the current version. So what they… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support.
Top Answer: Better integration with other solutions such as Oracle Database is needed. Currently, some SQL databases cannot be… more »
Top Answer: We are a solution provider and this is one of the products that we implement for our clients. I have helped to deploy… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Omada Identity SuiteIGI, IBM Security Identity Manager, ISIMSecurID
Learn
Omada
Video Not Available
IBM
RSA
Overview

Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies.

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence (IGI) delivers a business-centric approach to Identity Management and Governance. It empowers business and IT to work together to meet regulatory compliance and security goals across enterprise applications and data. IGI covers enterprise user lifecycle management, access risk assessment and mitigation, certification, password management as well as powerful analytics and reporting to enable business to make the right decisions on enterprise access.

RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
Offer
Learn more about Omada Identity
Learn more about IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence
Learn more about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
Sample Customers
Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol GroupE.ON Global CommoditiesNTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm13%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company4%
Company Size
No Data Available
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Microsoft and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is ranked 14th in Identity Management (IM) with 1 review while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 12th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is rated 7.0, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence writes "Clear evaluation and life cycle management; service center could be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "A reliable solution with some technical flaws that need to be addressed". IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, OpenIAM Identity Governance, CyberArk PAS, Saviynt and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), One Identity Manager, Oracle Identity Governance and Saviynt.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.