IBM Security Network IPS vs Palo Alto Threat Prevention

IBM Security Network IPS is ranked 16th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software vs Palo Alto Threat Prevention which is ranked 6th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 1 review. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Threat Prevention writes "A stable product that can alert you quickly to firewall threats". IBM Security Network IPS is most compared with Cisco Sourcefire 3D, Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS and Forcepoint Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall. Palo Alto Threat Prevention is most compared with Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS, Darktrace and IPS Sensor.

IBM Security Network IPS

Palo Alto Threat Prevention

18302

IBM Security Network IPS

31415

Palo Alto Threat Prevention

Based on 1 review.

Most Helpful Review

Use IBM Security Network IPS? Share your opinion.

Rinto Anto

Module Lead

A stable product that can alert you quickly to firewall threats

Basically, on the server side, it alerts me to threats. We are working to begin reporting on this. It affects me a lot.

Have A Question About Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software?

Our experts can help. 288,186 professionals have used our research on 6,462 solutions.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Security Network IPS vs Palo Alto Threat Prevention

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 288,186 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	16th out of 38 In Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software Views 1,586 Comparisons 553 Reviews 0 Followers 139 Avg. Rating N/A	6th out of 38 In Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software Views 801 Comparisons 627 Reviews 1 Followers 63 Avg. Rating 10.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Cisco Sourcefire 3D vs. IBM Security Network IPS Compared 34% of the time. Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS vs. IBM Security Network IPS Compared 15% of the time. Forcepoint Stonesoft Next Generation Firewall vs. IBM Security Network IPS Compared 14% of the time. See more IBM Security Network IPS competitors »	Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS vs. Palo Alto Threat Prevention Compared 30% of the time. Darktrace vs. Palo Alto Threat Prevention Compared 25% of the time. IPS Sensor vs. Palo Alto Threat Prevention Compared 12% of the time. See more Palo Alto Threat Prevention competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX
Website/Video
Website/Video	IBM	Palo Alto Networks
Overview
Overview	IBM Security Network Intrusion Prevention System appliances are designed to stop constantly evolving threats before they impact your business. This means providing both high levels of protection and performance, while lowering the overall cost and complexity associated with deploying and managing a large number of point solutions.	Threats do not discriminate between application delivery vectors, requiring an approach that has full visibility into all application traffic, including SSL encrypted content, with full user context. Threat Prevention leverages the visibility of our next-generation firewall to inspect all traffic, automatically preventing known threats, regardless of port, protocol or SSL encryption.
OFFER
Learn more about IBM Security Network IPS Learn More	Learn more about Palo Alto Threat Prevention Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre	University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Have A Question About Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software?

Our experts can help. 288,186 professionals have used our research on 6,462 solutions.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.