Compare IBM Security Secret Server vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager
 |
 Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: January 2021. 457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012. |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs. 457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,631 Comparisons 1,336 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 5,459 Comparisons 3,186 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 241 Rating 6.5 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 63% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 3% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time. | Compared 28% of the time.  Compared 27% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. Compared 3% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| IBM Secret Server, Secret Server, IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager | CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager |
Learn | |
| IBM | Broadcom |
Overview | |
IBM Security Secret Server protects privileged accounts from hackers and insider threats, helps ensure compliance with evolving regulations, and allows authorized employees to seamlessly gain access to the tools and information they need to drive productivity. Easily detect, manage and audit privileged accounts, and control which applications are permitted to run on endpoints and servers to prevent malicious applications from penetrating the environment. IBM Security Secret Server is fast to deploy, easy to use and scalable for the enterprise. | CA Privileged Access Manager is a simple-to-deploy, automated, proven solution for privileged access management in physical, virtual and cloud environments. It enhances security by protecting sensitive administrative credentials such as root and administrator passwords, controlling privileged user access, proactively enforcing policies and monitoring and recording privileged user activity across all IT resources. It includes CA PAM Server Control (previously CA Privileged Identity Manager) for fine-grained protection of critical servers |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Security Secret Server | Learn more about Symantec Privileged Access Manager |
Sample Customers | |
Information Not Available | NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company36% Comms Service Provider23% Government8% Insurance Company5% | Financial Services Firm21% Retailer16% Logistics Company16% Government11% Computer Software Company31% Comms Service Provider23% Government7% Financial Services Firm6% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business28% Midsize Enterprise5% Large Enterprise67% |
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Security Secret Server is ranked 12th in Privileged Access Management while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is ranked 8th in Privileged Access Management with 1 review. IBM Security Secret Server is rated 0.0, while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Privileged Access Manager writes "Great features that provide comprehensive coverage of what's required for the PAM solution". IBM Security Secret Server is most compared with Thycotic Secret Server, CyberArk PAS, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, ARCON Privileged Access Management and WALLIX Bastion, whereas Symantec Privileged Access Manager is most compared with CyberArk PAS, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), ARCON Privileged Access Management, ForgeRock and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.