We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. Micro Focus Service Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. Micro Focus Service Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution has been stable.""The brand name is the most valuable aspect of this solution for me. It's IBM. It's a global company that supports this product, it's not something open source or something like that.""SLA integrations, reports, and integration with other applications are the most valuable.""The solution is very easy to work with.""The workflow capability is useful. It's not a manual helpdesk operation. It's fully automated, even when an alarm has occurred. It covers the complete cycle of initiation to resolving the events. This is its most strong feature that is easily integrable with a monitoring solution. It creates tickets, and the workflow feature is the most important one.""What I like about the Control Desk is that everything is centralized. You have all the requests in one place, you know which ones are for whom and who is working on them."

More IBM SmartCloud Control Desk Pros »

"Its flexibility and ease of customization are its most valuable features.""It can adapt to any process in the organization.""The design has been revamped in terms of GUI. The current interface is quite easy to read.""Incident management is the most valuable because we're using it to manage tickets for an accounting system. With the reports that are available, it allows us to track and identify trends at the type and item level. It also helps us in managing the workload better than what we had in Remedy, which is what we were using before 2013."

More Micro Focus Service Manager Pros »

Cons
"Support has been the biggest problem for us. I understand that because we use the product of a global company, some changes are not quick to deploy.""The reporting in relation to updating could be improved upon.""The user interface is not very interesting. If you look at other products like JIRA and ServiceNow, they have made it much easier for the end-users. Maybe not ServiceNow, but JIRA is quite flexible. From a presentation point of view, IBM should make more user-friendly interfaces.""The time calculations can be improved. While working on reports, it was taking the time only in seconds, which was hard for me to work out. While creating some dialogs in the service portal, you have to use certain data types in some fields. It was very tricky to make them work. I was testing a certain type of input, and it didn't work. It didn't show me the domain that the fields have to show. I had to make the change to the database, and only then it worked. It was a tricky thing to make them work with the dialogs. Their technical support can also be improved in terms of response time.""The solution lacks a graphical user interface.""Overall the user experience, as opposed to the system and databases, could be improved. It does work as it should and it's good, but they should invest more in the user interfaces to be less data oriented and more appealing for the user."

More IBM SmartCloud Control Desk Cons »

"The solution does not interface well with other products and is difficult to implement.""With the new version moving toward the codeless configuration is good, but it's losing flexibility.""We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system.""Their end-user interface and technical support features could be improved."

More Micro Focus Service Manager Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's basically for a big company because of the costs. A small company can't afford the licensing cost. For medium and large companies, it's the best product. The price of the license is on the higher side compared to others."

More IBM SmartCloud Control Desk Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I would say that identify your requirements and pay for the support to implement and test those requirements, and then hope that you did a good job because the cost of their service is fairly expensive."

More Micro Focus Service Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The workflow capability is useful. It's not a manual helpdesk operation. It's fully automated, even when an alarm has occurred. It covers the complete cycle of initiation to resolving the events. This… more »
Top Answer: It's basically for a big company because of the costs. A small company can't afford the licensing cost. For medium and large companies, it's the best product. The price of the license is on the higher… more »
Top Answer: The user interface is not very interesting. If you look at other products like JIRA and ServiceNow, they have made it much easier for the end-users. Maybe not ServiceNow, but JIRA is quite flexible… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
10th
out of 55 in Help Desk Software
Views
1,094
Comparisons
791
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
839
Rating
7.5
23rd
out of 55 in Help Desk Software
Views
1,962
Comparisons
1,458
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
635
Rating
6.3
Comparisons
Also Known As
SmartCloud Control Desk
HPE ITSM, HPE Service Manager
Learn More
Overview
IBM Control Desk on Cloud offer an access to a user friendly self-service, automated service management, and seamlessly-integrated, best-practice based service desk capabilities. IBM Control Desk provides the IT service management (ITSM) needed to simplify support of users and infrastructure. It also offers a unified IT asset and service management software provides a common control center for managing business processes for both digital and physical assets and enables control, governance and compliance to applications, endpoints and assets to protect critical data and prevent outages. Control Desk is IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL)-compliant, accessible through mobile devices and integrates with social media and development tools.

Service Manager on SaaS provides you with a cloud-based, industry leading IT Service Management solution.

Offer
Learn more about IBM SmartCloud Control Desk
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Manager
Sample Customers
St Vincent's Health Australia, Kalibrate Pty. Ltd., Cognizant Technology
resultspositive, Globicon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government7%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Aerospace/Defense Firm12%
Healthcare Company8%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business57%
Large Enterprise43%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise76%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. Micro Focus Service Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,382 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is ranked 10th in Help Desk Software with 6 reviews while Micro Focus Service Manager is ranked 23rd in Help Desk Software with 4 reviews. IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus Service Manager is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of IBM SmartCloud Control Desk writes "Centralized solution to efficiently take care of customer service calls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Manager writes "A better GUI in place but still not user friendly and quite complex to implement". IBM SmartCloud Control Desk is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, SCSM, BMC Helix ITSM and Clarity SM, whereas Micro Focus Service Manager is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, BMC Helix ITSM and TOPdesk. See our IBM SmartCloud Control Desk vs. Micro Focus Service Manager report.

See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.