Compare IBM Softek TDMF vs. Quest QoreStor

IBM Softek TDMF is ranked 10th in Data Replication while Quest QoreStor is ranked 13th in Data Replication. IBM Softek TDMF is rated 0, while Quest QoreStor is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Softek TDMF is most compared with EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication, Symmetrix Remote Data Facility and Datos IO, whereas Quest QoreStor is most compared with EMC Data Domain.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Softek TDMF Logo
354 views|235 comparisons
Quest QoreStor Logo
118 views|65 comparisons
Ranking
10th
out of 19 in Data Replication
Views
354
Comparisons
235
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
13th
out of 19 in Data Replication
Views
118
Comparisons
65
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about HVR Software, NetApp, JumpMind and others in Data Replication. Updated: December 2019.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
Softek TDMFQoreStor
Learn
IBM
Quest Software
Overview
IBM Data Mobility Services Ð Softek Transparent Data Migration Facility (TDMF) z/OS uses skilled experts for a more reliable data migration, helping reduce the risk of disruptions or outages and enabling continuous application availability.

We are more than just a name – we are on a quest to make your information technology work harder for you. Our solutions simplify the IT operations at more than 100,000 organizations worldwide. Rely on us to help you turn data into insights quicker, modernize your infrastructure faster for the cloud, optimize the application experience and get control of every device that touches your network.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Softek TDMF
Learn more about Quest QoreStor
Sample Customers
BTAmerican Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford
Find out what your peers are saying about HVR Software, NetApp, JumpMind and others in Data Replication. Updated: December 2019.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.