We performed a comparison between IBM SoftLayer and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."The stability is the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."
"For us, the versioning was an issue."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
Earn 20 points
IBM SoftLayer is ranked 22nd in Public Cloud Storage Services while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. IBM SoftLayer is rated 8.6, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM SoftLayer writes "Stable with excellent speed and agility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". IBM SoftLayer is most compared with Amazon AWS, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service and Google Cloud Storage.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.