We performed a comparison between IBM SoftLayer and Rackspace Cloud [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."The stability is the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer."
"The most valuable feature for us is the support, which is really efficient."
"There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services."
"Image backup is a valuable feature. Even though this is a common feature, it is very helpful for us."
"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."
"For us, the versioning was an issue."
"It doesn't offer Elastic IP like AWS. And also we can't configure our server based on region."
"It would be nice to have more built-in suites compared to others. It would enable easier integration."
IBM SoftLayer is ranked 22nd in Public Cloud Storage Services while Rackspace Cloud [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Public Cloud Storage Services. IBM SoftLayer is rated 8.6, while Rackspace Cloud [EOL] is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM SoftLayer writes "Stable with excellent speed and agility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rackspace Cloud [EOL] writes "There is easy integration with multiple providers and third-party services". IBM SoftLayer is most compared with Amazon AWS, whereas Rackspace Cloud [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.