IBM solidDB vs. Infobright

IBM solidDB is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs Infobright which is ranked 9th in Relational Databases with 7 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". The top reviewer of Infobright writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, IBM Db2 and SQL Server. Infobright is most compared with Vertica, Pivotal Greenplum and MySQL.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
295,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM solidDB vs. Infobright

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
295,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
916
Comparisons
349
Reviews
1
Followers
106
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
3,203
Comparisons
845
Reviews
7
Followers
167
Avg. Rating
7.1
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
See more IBM solidDB competitors »
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more Infobright competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AssolidDB
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
Ignite Technologies
Overview
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

OFFER
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Infobright
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersIskratelREZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
31%
Media Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Newspaper
6%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
70%
Midsize Enterprise
10%
Large Enterprise
20%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
34%
Midsize Enterprise
28%
Large Enterprise
38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
295,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email