IBM solidDB vs. Infobright

IBM solidDB is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs Infobright which is ranked 9th in Relational Databases with 7 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "‚ÄčNo other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". The top reviewer of Infobright writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2. Infobright is most compared with Pivotal Greenplum, Vertica and Citus Data.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
1,003 views|333 comparisons
Infobright Logo
3,268 views|592 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
310,362 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
310,362 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
16th
Views
1,003
Comparisons
333
Reviews
1
Followers
97
Avg. Rating
9.0
9th
Views
3,268
Comparisons
592
Reviews
7
Followers
152
Avg. Rating
7.1
Top Comparisons
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn
IBM
Ignite Technologies
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Infobright
Sample Customers
IskratelREZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Media Company14%
Financial Services Firm12%
Newspaper6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business70%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise20%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise39%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
310,362 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email