Compare IBM solidDB vs. Infobright DB

IBM solidDB is ranked 12th in Relational Databases with 1 review while Infobright DB which is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 9.0, while Infobright DB is rated 4.6. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "‚ÄčNo other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2, whereas Infobright DB is most compared with Pivotal Greenplum, Vertica and MySQL.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
1,147 views|346 comparisons
Infobright DB Logo
3,626 views|529 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: August 2019.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
Views
1,147
Comparisons
346
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
372
Avg. Rating
9.0
16th
Views
3,626
Comparisons
529
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
590
Avg. Rating
4.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDBInfobright
Learn
IBM
Ignite Technologies
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Infobright DB
Sample Customers
IskratelREZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: August 2019.
359,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email