Compare IBM solidDB vs. LocalDB

IBM solidDB is ranked 27th in Relational Databases while LocalDB is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0, while LocalDB is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of LocalDB writes "Good for the development process, generally stable, and easy to set up". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2, whereas LocalDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL and IBM Informix.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
532 views|347 comparisons
LocalDB Logo
968 views|816 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
27th
Views
532
Comparisons
347
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
16th
Views
968
Comparisons
816
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
243
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

LocalDB is a lightweight version of the SQL Server Express Database Engine that is targeted for program development. LocalDB starts on demand and runs in user mode, so there is no complex configuration.
Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about LocalDB
Sample Customers
IskratelAstraZeneca, Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Kodak Alaris, Unilever, Floatel International and Kongsberg Maritime, MyHero
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email