IBM solidDB vs LocalDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
256 views|167 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
3,924 views|3,364 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM solidDB and LocalDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing cost is too high for LocalDB."
  • "The fees are fair."
  • More LocalDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Your concern as a mainframe engineer is understandable, and the decision by Fujitsu to give up its mainframe business is significant, raising questions about the future of the mainframe market… more »
    Top Answer:We pay an annual fee for the license. The fees are fair.
    Top Answer:I would like to have more integration.
    Ranking
    Views
    256
    Comparisons
    167
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    3,924
    Comparisons
    3,364
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    202
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 88% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Infobright DB logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Also Known As
    solidDB
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

    Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

    • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
    • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

    Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

    LocalDB is a lightweight version of the SQL Server Express Database Engine that is targeted for program development. LocalDB starts on demand and runs in user mode, so there is no complex configuration.
    Sample Customers
    Iskratel
    AstraZeneca, Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Kodak Alaris, Unilever, Floatel International and Kongsberg Maritime, MyHero
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization20%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM solidDB is ranked 29th in Relational Databases Tools while LocalDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases Tools with 5 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 9.0, while LocalDB is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LocalDB writes "Good for the development process, generally stable, and easy to set up". IBM solidDB is most compared with IBM Db2 Database and MySQL, whereas LocalDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle Database In-Memory, Oracle Database and Infobright DB.

    See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.