MarcinOzurkiewiczCo-Founder and Chief Executive Officer at EXEC
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.
Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:
Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.
IBM solidDB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases while LocalDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0.0, while LocalDB is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of LocalDB writes "Good for the development process, generally stable, and easy to set up". IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL and IBM Db2 Database, whereas LocalDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL and MariaDB.
See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.