Compare IBM solidDB vs. LocalDB

IBM solidDB is ranked 12th in Relational Databases with 1 review while LocalDB which is ranked 22nd in Relational Databases. IBM solidDB is rated 9.0, while LocalDB is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "‚ÄčNo other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". On the other hand, IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2, whereas LocalDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL and WizeHive Zengine.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
1,147 views|346 comparisons
LocalDB Logo
2,077 views|793 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use LocalDB? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: August 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
Views
1,147
Comparisons
346
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
372
Avg. Rating
9.0
22nd
Views
2,077
Comparisons
793
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 59% of the time.
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

LocalDB is a lightweight version of the SQL Server Express Database Engine that is targeted for program development. LocalDB starts on demand and runs in user mode, so there is no complex configuration.
Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about LocalDB
Sample Customers
IskratelAstraZeneca, Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Kodak Alaris, Unilever, Floatel International and Kongsberg Maritime, MyHero
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: August 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email