IBM solidDB vs LocalDB

IBM solidDB is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs LocalDB which is ranked 22nd in Relational Databases. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, IBM DB2 and SQL Server. LocalDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Informix.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use LocalDB? Share your opinion.
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
269,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM solidDB vs LocalDB

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
269,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
822
Comparisons
481
Reviews
1
Followers
219
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
1,376
Comparisons
573
Reviews
0
Followers
226
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 26% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 16% of the time.
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 9% of the time.
See more IBM solidDB competitors »
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 43% of the time.
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 13% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 7% of the time.
See more LocalDB competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AssolidDB
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
Microsoft
  • Vendor 7622 screenshot 1524943927
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

LocalDB is a lightweight version of the SQL Server Express Database Engine that is targeted for program development. LocalDB starts on demand and runs in user mode, so there is no complex configuration.
OFFER
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about LocalDB
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersIskratelAstraZeneca, Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Kodak Alaris, Unilever, Floatel International and Kongsberg Maritime, MyHero
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
269,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email