Compare IBM solidDB vs. NuoDB

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
431 views|228 comparisons
NuoDB Logo
1,047 views|977 comparisons
Ranking
29th
Views
431
Comparisons
228
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
Views
1,047
Comparisons
977
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn
IBM
NuoDB
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

NuoDB is a distributed database that can be deployed in any datacenter, in any cloud, anywhere, without the compromises inherent in other NewSQL solutions. Distributed SQL Database
Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about NuoDB
Sample Customers
IskratelForbes, UAE Exchange, GadgetKeeper
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM solidDB is ranked 29th in Relational Databases while NuoDB is ranked 24th in Relational Databases. IBM solidDB is rated 0.0, while NuoDB is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB, whereas NuoDB is most compared with CockroachDB, MySQL, Oracle Database, SQL Server and Oracle Database In-Memory.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.