IBM solidDB vs OmniSci comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
256 views|167 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OmniSci Logo
139 views|101 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM solidDB and OmniSci based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Your concern as a mainframe engineer is understandable, and the decision by Fujitsu to give up its mainframe business is significant, raising questions about the future of the mainframe market… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
256
Comparisons
167
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
139
Comparisons
101
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn More
OmniSci
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

The OmniSci platform is designed to overcome the scalability and performance limitations of legacy analytics tools faced with the scale, velocity and location attributes of today’s big datasets. Those tools are collapsing, becoming too slow and too hardware-intensive to be effective in big data analytics. OmniSci is a breakthrough technology, originating from MIT, designed to leverage the massively parallel processing of GPUs alongside traditional CPU compute, for extraordinary performance at scale.

Sample Customers
Iskratel
Pactriglo, TUTELA, Skyhook, npm, Inc., Simulmedia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization20%
Comms Service Provider9%
Computer Software Company9%
Retailer7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise74%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM solidDB is ranked 29th in Relational Databases Tools while OmniSci is ranked 33rd in Relational Databases Tools. IBM solidDB is rated 9.0, while OmniSci is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". On the other hand, IBM solidDB is most compared with IBM Db2 Database and MySQL, whereas OmniSci is most compared with Kinetica.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.