Compare IBM solidDB vs. Oracle Database

IBM solidDB is ranked 28th in Relational Databases while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases with 20 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0, while Oracle Database is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Very robust, ideal for companies that need mission-critical databases, and extremely mature". IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with IBM Db2 Database, SQL Server, Tibero, SAP HANA and MySQL.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
496 views|291 comparisons
Oracle Database Logo
18,712 views|14,033 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM solidDB? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and others in Relational Databases. Updated: July 2020.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The pricing is something that Oracle should work on to make the product more affordable, especially to businesses in third-world countries.Our licensing costs are between $40,000 and $50,000 per year. Those are the costs that cover maintenance and licensing.It is an excellent product, as long as the organization can afford the price tag.

More Oracle Database Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
Views
496
Comparisons
291
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
2nd
Views
18,712
Comparisons
14,033
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
475
Avg. Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDBOracle 12c, RDBMS
Learn
IBM
Oracle
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Oracle Database 12c introduces a new multitenant architecture that makes it easy to consolidate many databases quickly and manage them as a cloud service. Oracle Database 12c also includes in-memory data processing capabilities for breakthrough analytical performance. Additional database innovations deliver new levels of efficiency, performance, security, and availability. Oracle Database 12c comes in two editions to fit your business needs and budget: Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition 2.

For more information on Oracle RDBMS, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Oracle Database
Sample Customers
IskratelAgncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.A
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company11%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and others in Relational Databases. Updated: July 2020.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.