IBM solidDB vs Oracle Java DB

IBM solidDB is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs Oracle Java DB which is ranked 20th in Relational Databases. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, IBM DB2 and SQL Server. Oracle Java DB is most compared with Apache Derby, CockroachDB and IBM Informix.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Java DB? Share your opinion.
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM solidDB vs Oracle Java DB

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
822
Comparisons
481
Reviews
1
Followers
219
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
742
Comparisons
622
Reviews
0
Followers
386
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 26% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 16% of the time.
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more IBM solidDB competitors »
Apache
Compared 41% of the time.
Cockroach logo
Compared 8% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 7% of the time.
See more Oracle Java DB competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AssolidDB
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
Oracle
  • Vendor 7751 screenshot 1524945170
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

Java DB is a relational database management system (RDBMS). Data is stored and queried via SQL or JDBC. Like other RDBMSs, Java DB can also be accessed through a persistence layer such as JPA, Hibernate, or JDO. Java objects can be stored in the columns of Java DB tables.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Oracle Java DB
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersIskratel
Information Not Available
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email