IBM solidDB vs SAP HANA

IBM solidDB is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs SAP HANA which is ranked 11th in Relational Databases with 1 review. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". The top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Provides us with predictive capabilities for asset maintenance, and real-time forecasts". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, IBM DB2 and SQL Server. SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory, SQL Server and SAP ASE.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM solidDB vs SAP HANA

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Set up a consortium of consulting partners and hardware vendors to define your tech. Landscape TCO (total cost of ownership) and then approach the OEM for pricing (on-premise or on cloud or a hybrid model). Check if you can bring your own licenses for some of the existing application licenses on the new platform, to reduce TCO.

Read more »

Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
822
Comparisons
481
Reviews
1
Followers
219
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
6,517
Comparisons
4,236
Reviews
1
Followers
316
Avg. Rating
10.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 26% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 16% of the time.
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more IBM solidDB competitors »
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 13% of the time.
Sap065658 logo 300x300 0r 01
Compared 10% of the time.
See more SAP HANA competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AssolidDBSAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
SAP
  • Vendor 7931 screenshot 1525076118
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

SAP HANA converges database and application platform capabilities in-memory to transform transactions, analytics, text analysis, predictive and spatial processing so businesses can operate in real-time.
OFFER
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about SAP HANA
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersIskratelUnilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
37%
Insurance Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 05 12 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Microsoft, Teradata and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email