IBM solidDB vs SAP HANA

IBM solidDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 1 review vs SAP HANA which is ranked 16th in Relational Databases with 0 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, IBM DB2 and Oracle Database. SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database In-Memory, Progress OpenEdge RDBMS and InterSystems Cache.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use SAP HANA? Share your opinion.
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Teradata, Microsoft and others in Relational Databases.
252,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM solidDB vs SAP HANA

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Teradata, Microsoft and others in Relational Databases.
252,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
957
Comparisons
565
Reviews
1
Followers
235
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
6,243
Comparisons
3,379
Reviews
0
Followers
331
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
Ibm
Compared 8% of the time.
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 8% of the time.
See more IBM solidDB competitors »
Progress logo
Compared 7% of the time.
It central
Compared 7% of the time.
See more SAP HANA competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AssolidDBSAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1514653938
SAP
  • Vendor 7931 screenshot 1515865143
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

SAP HANA converges database and application platform capabilities in-memory to transform transactions, analytics, text analysis, predictive and spatial processing so businesses can operate in real-time.
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersIskratelUnilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
39%
Insurance Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Relational databases report from it central station 2018 01 27 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Teradata, Microsoft and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
252,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email