Compare IBM solidDB vs. SAP HANA

IBM solidDB is ranked 27th in Relational Databases while SAP HANA is ranked 5th in Relational Databases with 11 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "We can get more tenders because of the lower cost while providing a better product or service". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database and Teradata.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
532 views|347 comparisons
SAP HANA Logo
10,414 views|8,535 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM solidDB? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?Set up a consortium of consulting partners and hardware vendors to define your tech. Landscape TCO (total cost of ownership) and then approach the OEM for pricing (on-premise or on cloud or a hybrid model). Check if you can bring your own licenses for some of the existing application licenses on the new platform, to reduce TCO.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
27th
Views
532
Comparisons
347
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
5th
Views
10,414
Comparisons
8,535
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
428
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDBSAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Learn
IBM
SAP
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

The SAP HANA® platform helps you reimagine business by combining a robust database with services for creating innovative applications. It enables real-time business by converging trans-actions and analytics on one in-memory platform. Running on premise or in the cloud, SAP HANA untangles IT complexity, bringing huge savings in data management and empowering decision makers everywhere with new insight and predictive power.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about SAP HANA
Sample Customers
IskratelUnilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company29%
Non Tech Company14%
Mining And Metals Company14%
Government14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer7%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email