Compare IBM solidDB vs. SAP HANA

IBM solidDB is ranked 28th in Relational Databases while SAP HANA is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 10 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "We can get more tenders because of the lower cost while providing a better product or service". IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, Apache Spark, MySQL and Oracle Database In-Memory.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
496 views|291 comparisons
SAP HANA Logo
10,651 views|8,709 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM solidDB? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and others in Relational Databases. Updated: July 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?

More SAP HANA Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
Views
496
Comparisons
291
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
4th
Views
10,651
Comparisons
8,709
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
439
Avg. Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDBSAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Learn
IBM
SAP
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

The SAP HANA® platform helps you reimagine business by combining a robust database with services for creating innovative applications. It enables real-time business by converging trans-actions and analytics on one in-memory platform. Running on premise or in the cloud, SAP HANA untangles IT complexity, bringing huge savings in data management and empowering decision makers everywhere with new insight and predictive power.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about SAP HANA
Sample Customers
IskratelUnilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Construction Company11%
Government11%
Logistics Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company9%
Government4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and others in Relational Databases. Updated: July 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.