Compare IBM solidDB vs. SingleStore DB

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
431 views|228 comparisons
SingleStore DB Logo
3,069 views|2,748 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM solidDB? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."

More SingleStore DB Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: SQreamDB is a GPU DB. It is not suitable for real-time oltp of course. Cassandra is best suited for OLTP database use cases, when you need a scalable database (instead of SQL server, Postgres)… more »
Ranking
29th
Views
431
Comparisons
228
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
Views
3,069
Comparisons
2,748
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,087
Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn
IBM
SingleStore
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

MemSQL is The No Limits Database™, powering modern applications and analytical systems with a cloud-native, massively scalable architecture for maximum ingest and query performance with the highest concurrency. MemSQL envisions a world where every business can make decisions in real time and every experience is optimized through data. Global enterprises use the MemSQL distributed database to easily ingest, process, analyze, and act on data in order to thrive in today’s insight-driven economy. MemSQL is optimized to run on any public cloud or on-premises with commodity hardware. To learn more, visit our Product page - https://msql.co/2xUDAqL. To use MemSQL, get started with a free trial - https://msql.co/2NZOAy9.

Headquartered in San Francisco, CA with offices in Seattle, WA and Portland OR, MemSQL has raised $110M from top investors including GV, Accel Partners, and Khosla Ventures, among others. MemSQL is trusted by customers including Uber, Akamai, Dell EMC, Samsung, Comcast, Kellogg, and more.

If you want to work at a company that celebrates diversity, innovation, leadership, and creativity every day, check out our openings on our Careers page - https://msql.co/2RoTZgn.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about SingleStore DB
Sample Customers
IskratelUber, Akamai, Dell EMC, Samsung, Comcast, Kellogg
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM solidDB is ranked 29th in Relational Databases while SingleStore DB is ranked 10th in Relational Databases with 1 review. IBM solidDB is rated 0.0, while SingleStore DB is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore DB writes "MySQL Big Brother with built-in data pipeline, high concurrency, and blazing fast analytical queries". IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB, whereas SingleStore DB is most compared with CockroachDB, SQL Server, MySQL, MongoDB and SAP HANA.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.