Compare IBM solidDB vs. SQL Server

IBM solidDB is ranked 27th in Relational Databases while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases with 17 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0, while SQL Server is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Gives me the ability to mold a process flow or modularly add in new structures". IBM solidDB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server and IBM Db2, whereas SQL Server is most compared with Oracle Database, SAP HANA and Teradata.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM solidDB Logo
532 views|347 comparisons
SQL Server Logo
22,522 views|19,579 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM solidDB? Share your opinion.
GhamdanAl-Anesi
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is expensive, but you get what you pay for.Since we are a cloud-based company, there is AWS pricing on top of the SQL Server pricing. The Enterprise Edition can typically sell from around $1000 dollars a month, which is not cheap. Then, there is an additional one-time Windows cost, based on the code, which can go anywhere from $30,000 to $40,000 for the license.The setup cost is high, but it will return every penny.My advice is quite straightforward. If you know the number of users who really and truly need access to the Server then it is a no-brainer. If you do not know, then get the basic package and minimum licenses and start from there. Needless to say, users can develop/use data structures outside and then deploy onto the Server.The price has been going higher and higher. The market is quite price sensitive.This is a downside of enterprise Microsoft products.Currently, almost all of my machines are in Azure and I think it is the best way of licensing now (VM+software).​We are a Microsoft shop, so we use Active Directory. That integrates well with this product, but we did look at Oracle. We also looked at IBM. This was the best price point for us for what we were getting.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
27th
Views
532
Comparisons
347
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
1st
Views
22,522
Comparisons
19,579
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
344
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
solidDBMicrosoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

SQL Server is the Microsoft-driven relational database management system. This system is used to store data as well as retrieve it when necessary; these functions can be supported by individual users or by multiple users within a larger network. The Microsoft SQL Server has warehousing options, quality and integration services, management tools that are simple to implement, as well as robust tools for development.

Looking at the more technical end of things, Microsoft SQL Server uses query languages such as T-SQL and ANSI SQL. Disaster recovery is one of the product's most prominent features, in addition to in-memory performance, scalability, and corporate business intelligence capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about SQL Server
Sample Customers
IskratelMicrosoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company13%
Retailer8%
Comms Service Provider8%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email