IBM solidDB vs SQream DB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
256 views|167 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SQream Logo
437 views|307 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM solidDB and SQream DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Your concern as a mainframe engineer is understandable, and the decision by Fujitsu to give up its mainframe business is significant, raising questions about the future of the mainframe market… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
256
Comparisons
167
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
437
Comparisons
307
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
solidDB
Learn More
SQream
Video Not Available
Overview

IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.

Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:

  • The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
  • The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.

Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.

SQream DB is a relational database management systems (RDBMS) that uses graphics processing units(GPUs) from Nvidia. SQream DB is designed for big data analytics using the Structured Query Language (SQL).
Sample Customers
Iskratel
Orange Corporate IT
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization22%
Comms Service Provider9%
Computer Software Company9%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company26%
Computer Software Company14%
Healthcare Company12%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise60%
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM solidDB is ranked 29th in Relational Databases Tools while SQream DB is ranked 27th in Relational Databases Tools. IBM solidDB is rated 9.0, while SQream DB is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM solidDB writes "​No other solution came close to this product's speed and tech support is on a really high level". On the other hand, IBM solidDB is most compared with IBM Db2 Database and MySQL, whereas SQream DB is most compared with Oracle Database, MongoDB, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, SQL Server and SingleStore.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.