Compare IBM Spectrum Protect vs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus
IBM Spectrum Protect is ranked 3rd in Backup and Recovery Software with 57 reviews while IBM Spectrum Protect Plus which is ranked 40th in Backup and Recovery Software with 1 review. IBM Spectrum Protect is rated 8.4, while IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Protect writes "Performance and recoveries are better, and customers are happier with performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus writes "The solution is scalable and can be fitted for any customer". IBM Spectrum Protect is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault and Veritas NetBackup, whereas IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, IBM Spectrum Protect and Commvault.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use IBM Spectrum Protect Plus? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Rubrik, IBM and others in Backup and Recovery Software. Updated: June 2019. 353,599 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
This solution has improved our organization through better file and database recovery. The fact that we can take the backup straight onto tape is the most valuable feature. The most valuable features are compression and de-duplication. The best part of this solution is that it just works. The product is very stable. It is a very mature product. We optimize our costs of media and storage use, thanks to the Incremental Forever backup. The TDP software provides us many ways to protect our data, so we don't need to use monstrous scripts for doing backups now. I love the TDP for VMware because of the web interface and the possibilities provided by this tool. It's amazing. | The solution's stability is high because it is derived from Spectrum Protect. The solution is scalable and can be fitted for any customer. |
Cons | |
The deduplication must be perfect, and thus should be improved. We cannot take VMware backups for our banking data center environment. In the next version of the solution, I would like to see cloud support. The user interface needs to be improved. Sometimes we experience trouble with the backup transfer of the control files. This solution does not have good support for virtualization and a hyper-converged environment. The Hyper-V and SQL Server backup could be improved. In the 2016 version there was a significant improvement, but I think IBM has a big challenge with these technologies. A lot of my customers always ask for legal holds, especially on email. | I would like more integration with security. We need to show the value of the product in regards to handling security. For example, how it handles current malware or viruses. IBM should be more proactive in this direction. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
The licensing fees are on a yearly basis, which for us it is about R400,000 (approximately $27,000 USD). The pricing is a little expensive for our current employer, so they want to move to a cheaper solution. The pricing of the solution is high in comparison to other products on the market. For example, IBM and Symantec have less costly options. The product is low cost. It is very cool when we design it to using licensing based on post capacity. There may be an advantage to going with IBM in terms of pricing. They have a pay-as-you-grow policy, so there is no need to take one license for the entire datacenter. You can start with small licenses and then grow, and pay, as you use more. The different license models can give good benefits to the end customer. Regarding retro-compatibility of the product between versions, your data is always available and the ROI is unquestionable. The licensing is varied. If we have small environments (not many TB being managed) it is best to license by PVUs (depending on the number of cores of the machine). If we manage many TBs we look at licensing by capacity which allows us to use all the agents of the product. | If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive. The price offering from IBM is coming down because it is based on number of VM machines. So, IBM is coming to the market to show the added value of the product. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery Software solutions are best for your needs. 353,599 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 22,311 Comparisons 7,816 Reviews 54 Average Words per Review 525 Avg. Rating 8.5 | Views 3,617 Comparisons 2,853 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 662 Avg. Rating N/A |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 20% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time. | Compared 44% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| IBM TSM, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager | |
Learn | |
| IBM | IBM |
Overview | |
| IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) is a data protection platform that gives enterprises a single point of control and administration for backup and recovery. It is the flagship product in the IBM Spectrum Protect (Tivoli Storage Manager) family. It enables reliable, cost effective backups and fast recovery for virtual, physical and cloud environments of all sizes. | IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is a data protection and availability solution for virtual environments that can be deployed in minutes and protect your environment within an hour. It simplifies data protection, whether data is hosted in physical, virtual, software-defined or cloud environments. It can be implemented as a stand-alone solution or integrate with your IBM Spectrum Protect environment to off-load copies for long term storage and data governance with scale and efficiency. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Spectrum Protect | Learn more about IBM Spectrum Protect Plus |
Sample Customers | |
| CERN, Einstein Healthcare, Nyherji, Allianz Australia, TZM, ABT Online, NCT, Kindred Healthcare Inc., Cobalt Iron, TransGrid, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Cash America, Piedmont Healthcare, RWGV, Arkansas Tech University, British Columbia Institute of Technology | Information Not Available |
Top Industries | |
Healthcare Company22% Financial Services Firm22% University10% Comms Service Provider7% Manufacturing Company26% Financial Services Firm16% University14% Healthcare Company9% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Rubrik, IBM and others in Backup and Recovery Software. Updated: June 2019.
353,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also IBM Spectrum Protect Reviews, IBM Spectrum Protect Plus Reviews, and our list of Best Backup and Recovery Software Companies.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 27000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 27000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.