EzzAbdelfattahAssociate Professor of Statistics at KAU
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We think that IBM SPSS is expensive for this function."
"The price of this solution is a little bit high, which was a problem for my company."
"The pricing of the modeler is high and can reduce the utility of the product for those who can not afford to adopt it."
Earn 20 points
WPS is used in production on a huge range of systems at sites around the world. Thousands of analysts are using WPS in their daily data processing and analysis tasks, and thousands more rely on the heavy-lifting ability of WPS overnight and scheduled processing to deliver the information they require. Customers are able to choose to run WPS software on IBM z/OS Mainframes, servers and workstations running UNIX, Linux, Solaris, AIX, macOS and the full range of Microsoft Windows operating systems to fit in with existing or planned infrastructure.
IBM SPSS Statistics is ranked 5th in Data Science Platforms with 15 reviews while WPS Analytics is ranked 26th in Data Science Platforms. IBM SPSS Statistics is rated 8.0, while WPS Analytics is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM SPSS Statistics writes "Offers good Bayesian and descriptive statistics". On the other hand, IBM SPSS Statistics is most compared with IBM SPSS Modeler, TIBCO Statistica, Weka, MathWorks Matlab and Alteryx, whereas WPS Analytics is most compared with SAS Visual Analytics, Alteryx, SAS Visual Data Mining and Machine Learning and RapidMiner.
See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.