Compare IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is extremely scalable."

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Pros »

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity.""The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.""The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration.""With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros »

Cons
"Onboarding on the solution is complex. It's hard to onboard partners and customer suppliers. It's one aspect that is not that straightforward."

More IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services Cons »

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved.""In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them.""The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.""The older version of the solution will no longer be supported.""The cloud capability features need improvement.""I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.""The pricing for this solution is fine.""There are fees in addition to the licensing."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.
Top Answer: SAP has decided to move everything to the cloud, which means that we have to invest more. New investments would include things like redevelopment and data transfer. In general, we are not satisfied… more »
Ranking
Views
1,808
Comparisons
1,563
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
596
Rating
9.0
Views
5,933
Comparisons
4,663
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
789
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
Learn
IBM
SAP
Overview

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services are designed to alleviate the burden on internal resources by providing secure connectivity and collaboration with your customers, suppliers, and business partners. The solution is built on the cloud-based B2B integration and visibility capabilities of IBM Sterling B2B Collaboration Network and provides comprehensive service offerings for partner onboarding, B2B process management, and trading partner support.

  • Facilitate growth by rapidly growing and adapting your B2B community without burdening internal resources and capital
  • Reduce B2B total cost of ownership by reducing the cost and increasing the reliability of B2B operations

Accelerate B2B collaboration with global customers and suppliers by leveraging our B2B expertise.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services
Learn more about SAP Process Orchestration
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Retailer9%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company13%
Mining And Metals Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Large Enterprise67%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is ranked 5th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 3rd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 7 reviews. IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is rated 9.0, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services writes "Flexible and scalable with great pricing options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "Gateway for all integrations that is stable and quick to install". IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services is most compared with OpenText Trading Grid, Mule ESB, Mule Anypoint Platform, IBM Transformation Extender and Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, Boomi AtomSphere Integration and SAP Data Services.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.