We performed a comparison between IBM StoredIQ and Lucidworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, IBM, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search."IBM StoredIQ Suite helps to address problems like data discovery, records management, compliance activities, storage optimization, and data migration initiatives."
"Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform and controls how the scoring for search results is done, letting you customize the search experience according to your needs."
"The valuable features are automation and multiple connectors available out of the box. It is simple to manage and easier to use for all users."
"The product was born and designed to be used inside the IT department, but it would be improved by allowing end-users to search for info related to specific needs."
"The solution could improve by adding more AI and natural language processing."
"Having some kind of prebuilt client UI will be helpful."
IBM StoredIQ is ranked 19th in Indexing and Search while Lucidworks is ranked 7th in Indexing and Search. IBM StoredIQ is rated 8.0, while Lucidworks is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM StoredIQ writes "Helps with GDPR compliance through data discovery and management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lucidworks writes "Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform". IBM StoredIQ is most compared with , whereas Lucidworks is most compared with Elastic Search and Coveo.
See our list of best Indexing and Search vendors.
We monitor all Indexing and Search reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
