Compare IBM Supply Chain Business Network vs. SEEBURGER BIS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Supply Chain Business Network? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
On an annual basis, our support costs, which are based on the licensing, are about £120,000.The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business.We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box.There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour.We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them.The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license...Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle.We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable.

More SEEBURGER BIS Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: If SEEBURGER plans to do something, they will meet their target. We haven't been disappointed by them at all. For example, we had six trading partners to onboard and they said, "We'll make it happen,"… more »
Top Answer: The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if… more »
Top Answer: For the area that we've used them for so far, I don't really see any way that they can make it easier. I can't say enough about how they have delivered exactly what they said that they would, and for… more »
Ranking
Views
315
Comparisons
262
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
6,510
Comparisons
1,976
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
1,644
Avg. Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Sterling B2B Collaboration Network, Sterling Commerce Collaboration NetworkSeeburger Business Integration Suite
Learn
IBM
Seeburger
Overview

IBM B2B Collaboration Network helps you reduce the time and complexity of integrating with your local and global business partners. Use our expert services to on-board faster, automate electronic document interchange and manage your B2B operations—through a connection to more than 300,000 trading partners worldwide. The secure and scalable solution can help you solve business-to-business challenges such as managed file transfer, language translations and connecting people, systems and technology.

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Supply Chain Business Network
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Sample Customers
Bonnie Plants, Irish Dairy BoardAltis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company25%
Retailer20%
Pharma/Biotech Company15%
Logistics Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Non Profit7%
Retailer7%
Wholesaler/Distributor6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Supply Chain Business Network is ranked 17th in Business-to-Business Middleware while SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 20 reviews. IBM Supply Chain Business Network is rated 0.0, while SEEBURGER BIS is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation from one data format to another". IBM Supply Chain Business Network is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and OpenText Trading Grid, whereas SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, OpenText Trading Grid and SAP Process Orchestration.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.