IBM System Architect vs. Salamander MooD Active Enterprise

IBM System Architect is ranked 17th in Business Process Design with 1 review vs Salamander MooD Active Enterprise which is ranked 26th in Business Process Design. The top reviewer of IBM System Architect writes "It has helped in supporting the development of an Enterprise Data Model". IBM System Architect is most compared with No Magic MagicDraw, Visual Paradigm and Visio. Salamander MooD Active Enterprise is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Visio.

18597

IBM System Architect

Based on 1 review.

20835

Salamander MooD Active Enterprise

32614

Null Product

Most Helpful Review

Michiel Jeuken

IT Architect at a energy/utilities company

It has helped in supporting the development of an Enterprise Data Model

It has helped in supporting the development of an Enterprise Data Model.

Use Salamander MooD Active Enterprise? Share your opinion.

Use Null Product? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems, Bizagi, Software AG and others in Business Process Design.

Download now

300,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM System Architect vs. Salamander MooD Active Enterprise

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 300,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
17th out of 33 In Business Process Design Views 682 Comparisons 367 Reviews 1 Followers 60 Avg. Rating 6.0	26th out of 33 In Business Process Design Views 316 Comparisons 162 Reviews 0 Followers 55 Avg. Rating N/A	1st out of 206 In Emerging Solutions Views 0 Comparisons 0 Reviews 1 Followers 1 Avg. Rating 5.0
Top Comparisons
No Magic MagicDraw vs. IBM System Architect Compared 34% of the time. Visual Paradigm vs. IBM System Architect Compared 15% of the time. Visio vs. IBM System Architect Compared 9% of the time. See more IBM System Architect competitors »	Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs. Salamander MooD Active Enterprise Compared 91% of the time. Visio vs. Salamander MooD Active Enterprise Compared 9% of the time. See more Salamander MooD Active Enterprise competitors »	Veeam Backup & Replication vs. Null Product Compared 53% of the time. Zerto Virtual Replication vs. Null Product Compared 47% of the time.
Also Known As
System Architect	MooD Active Enterprise
Website/Video
IBM	Salamander	Null Vendor
Overview
IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture tool, that you can use to visualize, analyze, and communicate all aspects of an enterprise architecture by applying industry-standard frameworks, notations, and methods. After you capture and understand an architecture, you can plan and implement its future improvements intelligently.	MooD Active Enterprise is a server-side product for deploying and managing configured solutions across a wide community of users. The product exploits standard enterprise web technologies to provide highly visual and compelling support to complex end-to-end decision processes.Users understand, assess and act on actual and potential business activity, performance and outcomes.	Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about IBM System Architect Learn More	Learn more about Salamander MooD Active Enterprise Learn More	Learn more about Null Product Learn More
Sample Customers
Wuxi Lake Cloud, Nationwide, ETI, IDS Scheer	PFA, HP, Datapoint, Ministry of Defence	Information Not Available

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sparx Systems, Bizagi, Software AG and others in Business Process Design.

Download now

300,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.