We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The integration effort with the end application is quite straightforward and easy."
"SAML 2.0."
"OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server."
"Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."
"The Verify feature: A push method which customers are going for."
"It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"Password sharing and SSO. These features almost become a necessity to make sure that company data is safe and reduce the possibility of data breach."
"It keeps my passwords organized and safe."
"The ability to autofill the login credentials has saved me a lot of time in my day to day computing."
"It has a double authentication factor increasing the security level."
"A useful solution for storing encryption keys, programming and developing a SaaS platform."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available."
"An Amazon Machine Image (AMI) for the newer appliance versions for hosting the virtual appliances on AWS will help."
"Multi-factor authentication with social integration needs to improve."
"Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs."
"The self-service portal needs improvement."
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"The technical support for this solution could be faster support and improved if they had a better understanding of my questions."
"It would be nice to see this great tool integrate with other tools out there."
"Possible offline access to passwords. Therefore, when internet access is unavailable, I can still access my vault."
"I would like to see a way to store files and photos in the next update. If it already does this, I have yet to explore it."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] writes "Reverse proxy means applications need only minimal changes to support SSO with ISAM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
