IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs Infor Risk and Compliance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and Infor Risk and Compliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."
  • More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Single Sign-On (SSO)
    38th
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    145
    Comparisons
    104
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager
    Infor Approva, Approva
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.
    Infor Risk and Compliance (Approva) version 10 provides powerful controls monitoring to discover exceptions and violations across key enterprise applications. It offers improved performance, an intuitive user experience, enhanced reporting, and new analytic dashboards to improve visibility into risks. It supports Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition as its database and reporting server. It has enhanced extraction performance and enriched fuzzy logic algorithms, along with advanced data analysis, and reporting to quickly screen exceptions, identify violations and ultimately minimize exposure to risk.
    Sample Customers
    Essex Technology Group Inc.
    Parkland Health, Denver Public Schools, LL Bean, SEB Group, Hansa Hydrocarbons, World Vision
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Insurance Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Educational Organization8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Infor Risk and Compliance is ranked 38th in GRC. IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Infor Risk and Compliance is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] writes "Reverse proxy means applications need only minimal changes to support SSO with ISAM". On the other hand, IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Infor Risk and Compliance is most compared with .

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.